ObjectiveTo evaluate the morphology of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) femoral insertion in order to describe its anatomical features and insertion site location, with the aim of verifying if the ACL femoral insertion has individual characteristics and to provide information for appropriate femoral tunnel placement on anatomic ACL reconstruction.MethodsSixteen knees obtained from amputations were studied. The ACL femoral bundles and insertion shape were observed macroscopically, and the ligaments insertion length and thickness were measured with a digital caliper. The distances between the limits of the ligament to the articular cartilage, and the measurement of the area of insertion were checked using ImageJ software.ResultsThe ACL femoral insertion site was eccentric, closer to the deep condyle cartilage. In ten knees (62.5%), the ACL femoral insertion was oval; the mean length of the insertion was 16.4 mm, varying from 11.3 to 19.3 mm, the mean thickness varied from 7.85 to 11.23 mm, and the mean area of the insertion was 99.7 mm2, varying from 80.9 a 117.2 mm2. The mean distances between the limits of the ligament to the superficial, deep, and inferior articular cartilage were 9.77 ± 1.21, 2.60 ± 1.20, and 1.86 ± 1.15 mm, respectively.ConclusionThere was a 30% to 40% difference between the minimum and maximum results of measurements of ACL femoral insertion length, thickness, and area demonstrating an important individual variation. The insertion site was eccentric, closer to the deep cartilage of the lateral femoral condyle.

Objetivo: Avaliar o perfil epidemiológico das fraturas do rádio distal em hospitais de referência em Ribeirão Preto(SP), Brasil. Não existem dados suficientes na literatura nacional que corroborem com o perfil epidemiológico das fraturas do rádio distal. Métodos: 245 pacientes apresentaram 254 fraturas do rádio distal, ocorridas entre 2014 a 2017 foram avaliadas retrospectivamente para obtenção do perfil epidemiológico. Os fatores analisados foram idade e sexo, mecanismo do trauma, sazonalidade, tipo de fratura baseada na Classificação AO, presença de exposição óssea, lesões associadas, tipo de tratamento realizado (conservador ou cirúrgico) e o tipo de implante utilizado nos tratamentos cirúrgicos. Resultados: 60,2% dos pacientes participantes eram do sexo masculino e 39,8% do sexo feminino, distribuídos de forma bimodal. A média de idade foi 45,4 anos. Fraturas expostas corresponderam a 92,1% das fraturas e 7,9% representaram as expostas. Pacientes politraumatizados representaram 62,6%. O tempo médio de internação foi 8,09 dias. Conclusão: Apesar do padrão de fraturas mostrar semelhanças com outros estudos, o padrão apresentado pode não traduzir, de forma homogênea, o padrão obtido em outras metrópoles e grandes centros.Descritores: Fraturas do Rádio; Traumatismos do Punho; Epidemiologia; Hospitais Especializados.ReferênciasBruce KK, Merenstein DJ, Narvaez MV, Neufeld SK, Paulus MJ, Tan TP et al. Lack of Agreement on Distal Radius Fracture Treatment. J Am Board Fam Med. 2016;29(2):218-25.MacIntyre NJ, Dewan N. Epidemiology of distal radius fractures and factors predicting risk and prognosis. J Hand Ther. 2016;29(2):136-45.Court-Brown CM, Caesar B. Epidemiology of adult fractures: A review. Injury. 2006;37(8):691-97.Nellans KW, Kowalski E, Chung KC. The epidemiology of distal radius fractures. Hand Clin. 2012;28(2):113-25. Flinkkilä T, Sirniö K, Hippi M, Hartonen S, Ruuhela R, Ohtonen P et al. Epidemiology and seasonal variation of distal radius fractures in Oulu, Finland. Osteoporos Int. 2011;22(8):2307-312.Lindau TR, Aspenberg P, Arner M, Redlundh-Johnell I, Hagberg L. Fractures of the distal forearm in young adults. An epidemiologic description of 341 patients. Acta Orthop Scand. 1999;70(2):124-28.Diamantopoulos AP, Rohde G, Johnsrud I, Skoie IM, Hochberg M, Haugeberg G. The epidemiology of low- and high-energy distal radius fracture in middle-aged and elderly men and women in Southern Norway. PLoS One. 2012;7(8):e43367.Wilcke MK, Hammarberg H, Adolphson PY. Epidemiology and changed surgical treatment methods for fractures of the distal radius: a registry analysis of 42,583 patients in Stockholm County, Sweden, 2004–2010. Acta Orthop. 2013;84(3):292-96.Sigurdardottir K, Halldorsson S, Robertsson J. Epidemiology and treatment of distal radius fractures in Reykjavik, Iceland, in 2004. Comparison with an Icelandic study from 1985. Acta Orthop. 2011;82(4):494-98.Solgaard S, Petersen VS. Epidemiology of distal radius fractures. Acta Orthop Scand. 1985;56(5):391-93.Brogren E, Petranek M, Atroshi I. Incidence and characteristics of distal radius fractures in a southern Swedish region. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2007;8:48. Tsai CH, Muo CH, Fong YC, et al. A population-based study on trend in incidence of distal radial fractures in adults in Taiwan in 2000-2007. Osteoporos Int. 2011;22(11):2809-815.Koo OT, Tan DM, Chong AK. Distal radius fractures: an epidemiological review. Orthop Surg. 2013;5(3):209-13. Dóczi J, Renner A. Epidemiology of distal radius fractures in Budapest. A retrospective study of 2,241 cases in 1989. Acta Orthop Scand. 1994;65(4):432-33.Chen NC, Jupiter JB. Management of distal radial fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007;89(9):2051-62.Pagano M, Gauvreau K. Princípios de Bioestatística. 2. ed. São Paulo: Pioneira Thompson Learning; 2004.                                  Court-Brown CM. Epidemiologia das fraturas e luxações. In: Court-Brown CM et al. (ed.); Fraturas em adultos de Rockwood Green. 8. ed. Barueri, SP: Manole; 2016.Fanuele J, Koval KJ, Lurie J, Zhou W, Tosteson A, Ring D. Distal radial fracture treatment: what you get may depend on your age and address. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009;91(6):1313-19.Jupiter JB, Marent-Huber M; LCP Study Group. Operative management of distal radial fractures with 2.4-millimeter locking plates: a multicenter prospective case series. Surgical technique. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010;92(Suppl 1 Pt 1):96-106.

No abstract