This is an open access article under the terms of the Creat ive Commo ns Attri bution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Fatigue with its underlying mechanisms and effects is a broadly discussed topic and an important phenomenon, particularly in endurance sports. Although several studies have already shown a variety of changes in running kinematics with fatigue, few of them have analyzed competitive runners and even fewer have focused on middle-distance running. Furthermore, the studies investigating fatigue-related changes have mostly reported the results in terms of discrete parameters [e.g., range of motion (RoM)] in the frontal or sagittal plane, and therefore potentially overlooked effects occurring in subphases of the gait cycle or in the transverse plane. On this basis, the goal of the present study was to analyze the effects of exhaustive middle-distance running on expert runners by means of both discrete parameters and time series analysis in 3D. In this study, 13 runners ran on a treadmill to voluntary exhaustion at their individually determined fatigue speeds which was held constant during the measurements. Kinematic data were collected by means of a 3D motion capture system. Spatiotemporal and stiffness parameters as well as the RoM of joints and of center of mass (CoM) within the stance and flight phases were calculated. Independent t-tests were performed to investigate any changes in means and coefficients of variation (CV) of these parameters between the rested (PRE) and fatigued (POST) state. Statistical parametric mapping method was applied on the time series data of the joints and the CoM. Results from this exploratory study revealed that during a middle-distance run, expert runners change their stance time, rather than their step frequency or step length in order to maintain the constant running speed as long as possible. Increased upper body movements occurred to counteract the increased angular moment of the lower body possibly due to longer stance times. These findings provide insights into adaptation strategies of expert runners during a fatiguing middle-distance run and may serve a valuable information particularly for comparisons with other group of runners (e.g., females or non-athletes) as well with other conditions (e.g., non-constant speed or interval training), and might be useful for the definition of training goals (e.g., functional core training).
The uncontrolled manifold (UCM) approach has been widely used in recent studies to examine variability in daily tasks; however, it has not yet been used to study running or the effects of expertise. Therefore, the aim of this study was to analyse the synergy structure stabilizing the centre of mass (CoM) trajectory in experts compared to novices during running at two different speeds using a subject-specific 3D model. A total of 25 healthy young adults (13 experts, 12 novices) participated in the study. All subjects ran at 10 and 15 km h −1 on a treadmill. In each case, kinematics of 20 consecutive gait cycles were recorded and the effects of expertise and gait cycle phase on the synergy structure were investigated at both speeds. Specifically, the variance affecting the CoM (UCM ⊥ ), the variance not affecting the CoM (UCM ), and their ratio (UCM Ratio ) were analysed. Descriptively, in both groups there was a synergy stabilizing the CoM trajectory in running. However, the ANOVA showed no differences in UCM Ratio between the two groups. In novices, UCM ⊥ and UCM were significantly higher compared to experts at the 15 km h −1 condition. In both groups, there was more variability in the stance phase compared to the flight phase in the majority of cases. The results indicate that experts adopted a more consistent running style. The stride-to-stride variability was diminished but not abolished. This difference was only visible at the 15 km h −1 condition. Furthermore, variability was less constrained in the stance phase compared to the flight phase.
Kinematic synergies (kSYN) provide an approach to quantify the covariation of joint motions and to explain the mechanisms underlying human motor behavior. A low-dimensional control strategy by means of the activation of a moderate number of kSYN would simplify the performance of complex motor tasks. The purpose of this study was to examine similarities between the kSYN of varying locomotion tasks: straight-line walking, walking a 90° spin turn and walking upstairs. Task-specific kSYN were extracted from full body kinematic recordings of 13 participants by principal component analysis. The first five kSYN accounting for most of the variance within each task were selected for further analysis following previous studies. The similarities between the kSYN of the three different locomotion tasks were quantified by calculating cosine similarities (SIM), as a vector-based similarity measure ranging from 0 (no similarity) to 1 (high similarity), between absolute principal component loading vectors. A SIM between two kSYN > 0.8 was interpreted as highly similar. Two to three highly similar kSYN were identified when comparing two individual tasks with each other. One kSYN, primarily characterized by anteversion and retroversion of the arms and legs, were found to be similar in all three tasks. Additional kSYN that occurred between individual tasks reflected mainly an upwards/downwards movement of the body or a countercyclical knee flexion/extension. The results demonstrate that the three investigated locomotion tasks are characterized by kSYN and that certain kSYN repeatedly occur across the three locomotion tasks. PCA yields kSYN which are in descent order according to their amount of total variance accounted for. Referring to the placing of a kSYN within the order as priorization, we found a change in priorization of repeatedly occurring kSYN across the individual tasks. The findings support the idea that movements can be efficiently performed through a flexible combination of a lower number of control-relevant variables.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.