No abstract

No abstract

Inflammatory markers are elevated in type 2 diabetic patients (DP) and may predict the development of type 2 diabetes. Our aims were to analyze differences in the expression of inflammatory and immunological molecules between DP and healthy subjects and to investigate whether glycemic control might prevent the overexpression of inflammatory markers in DP. Twenty-two DP with advanced atherosclerosis and eight healthy blood donors were included. DP were classified as well (HbA1c ≤ 6.5) or poorly controlled (HbA1c > 6.5). In "in vitro" studies, monocytes were exposed to low (5.5 mM) or high glucose (26 mM) concentrations in the absence or presence of insulin. Expression profiling of 14 inflammatory genes was analyzed using TLDA analysis. "In vivo" results show that monocytes from DP had increased levels of monocyte chemoattractant protein (MCP-1) and interleukin 6 (IL6) and lower levels of Toll-like receptor 2 (TLR2) mRNA than healthy subjects. Well-controlled DP had lower levels of IL-6 than poorly controlled DP, suggesting that glycemic control may prevent IL6 mRNA alterations associated with diabetes. "In vitro" results demonstrate that glucose directly and significantly induced MCP-1 and IL6 and reduced TLR2 mRNA expression. Insulin at high dose (100 IU/ml) dramatically enhanced the upregulatory effects of glucose on MCP-1 and IL-6 and reduced per se TLR2 mRNA expression. MCP-1, IL-6 and TLR2 are key inflammatory players altered in monocytes from type 2 DP. Both hyperinsulinemia and hyperglycemia contribute to alter the expression of these genes. The glycemic control only significantly prevented IL6 overexpression in this group of patients.

In the light of the current controversy surrounding the use of hemorheologic and vasodilator drugs in the treatment of peripheral arteriosclerosis, a comparative study was designed in order to evaluate the efficacy of pentoxifylline, buflomedil, and nifedipine in 45 patients with peripheral arterial disease (Fontaine stage II). The patients in this prospective randomized study were divided into three groups: 15 patients received pentoxifylline treatment (1,200 mg/day), 15 were treated with buflomedil (600 mg/day), and 15 with nifedipine (60 mg/day). Response to treatment was assessed at the start of the study and after forty-five and ninety days, by clinical examination, Doppler test, strain test, and digital occlusion plethysmography using a strain gauge ring. Pentoxifylline was significantly more effective (P < 0.05) than buflomedil and nifedipine at ninety days in improving walking performance, resting toe pressure, resting and postexercise ankle/brachial pressure ratio, and basal/postischemic toe-pulse ratio. Significant differences within groups were also noted for initial claudication, toe peak-flow time, pulse reappearance time (PRT/2), and maximum postischemic flow time, together with significant intergroup variables. In conclusion, pentoxifylline proved more effective than the other drugs tested in: 1. improving distal pressure and resting microcirculatory blood flow; 2. increasing postexercise distal flow, ratios, and pressures and enabling faster recuperation of basal pulse rates; 3. increasing initial claudication distance in the strain test within the test group and achieving a greater absolute subjective claudication distance than that obtained using the other treatments.