Introduction: The aim of the study was to report the perioperative and functional results of Robotic assisted kidney transplantation (RAKT) in Grafts with multiple vessels (GMVs) and compare it to the results of Open kidney transplantation (OKT) with GMVs. Materials and Methods: Patients undergoing RAKT from living donors using GMVs were reviewed from prospectively collected RAKT database at our institution between March 2013 and March 2018. Patient undergoing Open kidney transplantation (OKT) using GMVs served as controls. Ex-vivo bench surgical reconstruction of GMVs was done according to specific anatomy. Propensity score matching was used to balance the sample size in the two groups. Results: Of 153 RAKT and OKT procedures, 86 cases were eligible for propensity score matching for the statistically significant variables (standardized difference >0.10) and 43 procedures were assigned to each group. Median anastomoses, total and cold ischemia and rewarming times did not differ significantly between the RAKT and OKT groups. In comparison with OKT in GMVs we found that RAKT with GMVs had less pain score on post op 2nd day ( p = 0.03). There was also a significant difference in mean analgesic requirement ( p = 0.02), hospital stay ( p = 0.05) and incision length ( p = 0.04). Most of the major, minor surgical, and medical postoperative complications were comparable between the two groups except for wound related events ( p = 0.002). Conclusion: Multiplicity of renal vessels in RAKT does not adversely affect patient or graft survival compared with the OKT. Satisfactory functional outcome can be achieved by RAKT similar to OKT in GMVs. RAKT seems to have advantage over OKT in that it is less invasive and has the potential to cause fewer low grade complications. Small sample size and short follow-up are the main limitations of the study.

Introduction Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) pandemic led to a sudden drop in renal transplant numbers across India in the initial months of 2020. Although the transplant numbers increased with easing of lockdown, the outcome of these transplants remains unknown. Methods This was a retrospective, observational, multi‐center study done across eight different transplant centers in India. All the transplants done from January 30, 2020 to December 31, 2020 were included. The primary outcomes studied were patient and death censored graft survival as well as incidence of COVID‐19 infection and its outcomes. Results During the study period a total of 297 kidney transplants were done. After a median follow up of 265 days the patient and death censored graft survival was 95.3% and 97.6%, respectively. Forty‐one patients (13.8%) developed COVID‐19 post‐transplant. Majority (58.5%) were asymptomatic to mildly symptomatic and the case fatality ratio was 14.6%. On multivariable logistic regression analysis older age was associated with higher likelihood of COVID‐19 infection (odds ratio 1.038; CI 1.002–1.077). Conclusions Patient and graft outcome of kidney transplants done during the COVID‐19 pandemic in India was acceptable. The incidence of COVID‐19 was 13.8% with a high case fatality ratio.

Combined surgery and radiology treats the end result of the failure of the sinusoidal smooth muscle to relax. Although some patients, the majority of whom are young (aged < 40 years), will achieve short-term benefit, all individuals need to be fully counselled with regard to the likelihood of long-term benefit before undergoing this invasive method of treatment.

Because of the development of epithelial hyperplasia and stent migration in approximately one-third of men in this study, a third generation stent has now been developed. Before permanently implanted stents can be recommended for widespread use, the efficacy of new stents should be assessed in specialist units with large numbers of patients and adequate facilities for follow-up.

No abstract