No abstract

Introduction Mechanical neck pain (MNP) is a commonly occurring musculoskeletal condition that is usually managed using electrical modalities, joint mobilization techniques, and therapeutic exercises, but has limited evidence of their efficacy. Pathology (densification) of the deep cervical fascia that occurs due to the increased viscosity of hyaluronic acid (HA) may induce neck pain and associated painful symptoms of the upper quarter region. Fascial manipulation (FM) and yoga poses are considered to reduce the thixotropy of the ground substances of the deep fascia and improve muscle function. The purpose of this study is to investigate the effect of FM and sequential yoga poses (SYP) when compared to the usual care on pain, function, and oculomotor control in MNP. Methods This FaCe-Man trial will recruit 160 patients with subacute and chronic mechanical neck pain diagnosed using predefined criteria. Participants will be randomized to either the intervention group or the usual care group, using a random allocation ratio of 1:1. Patients in the intervention group will receive FM (4 sessions in 4 weeks) and SYP (12 weeks) whereas the standard care group will receive cervical mobilization/ thoracic manipulation (4 sessions in 4 weeks) and therapeutic exercises (12 weeks). The primary outcome is the change in the numeric pain rating scale (NPRS). The secondary outcomes include changes in the patient-specific functional scale and oculomotor control, myofascial stiffness, fear-avoidance behavior questionnaire, and elbow extension range of motion during neurodynamics test 1. Discussion If found effective, FM along with SYP investigated in this trial can be considered as a treatment strategy in the management of mechanical neck pain. Considering the magnitude of the problem, and the pragmatic and patient-centered approach to be followed, it is worth investigating this trial. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov CTRI/2020/01/022934. Registered on January 24, 2020 with ctri.nic.in. Clinical Trials Registry – India.

Background. Glenohumeral Internal Rotation Deficit (GIRD) is common among overhead athletes and is considered as one of the risk factors for upper extremity injuries. GIRD is usually managed by stretching and soft tissue release of the posterior shoulder capsule. Fascial manipulation is a manual therapy technique used in the management of musculoskeletal disorders. This study compared the efficacy of fascial manipulation (FM) with posterior capsular ball release and stretching on GIRD. Purpose. The purpose of this study is to determine the effect of Fascial Manipulation (FM) on the Internal Rotation Range of Motion (IRROM) in athletes with GIRD. Since studies have shown a possible association between GIRD and shoulder injuries, improving the IRROM in athletes with GIRD may help in reducing the risk of shoulder injuries. Thus, FM may be used as an effective strategy in increasing IRROM in overhead athletes with GIRD, thus preventing upper extremity injuries. Study Design. Randomized controlled trial. Methods. Asymptomatic overhead athletes with GIRD more than 20° when compared with the non-dominant shoulder were randomly assigned to two groups. The experimental group has received three sessions of FM treatment in two weeks. FM applied to densified Centre of Coordination (CC) points located on the myofascial sequences for 5 to 8 minutes at each CC point. The control group has received three sessions of posterior shoulder capsule release using a tennis ball under supervision. Along with the ball release, the therapist taught home-based, unsupervised sleeper, and cross-body adduction stretches, for the control group. A universal goniometer was used to measure the IRROM before and after all three treatment sessions in both groups. Results. There were no statistically significant differences between the control and experimental groups (p< 0.05). However, immediate improvement in the IRROM following FM was more substantial in the experimental group following each session. Conclusions. This study indicates that FM may be used as an adjunct to stretching in asymptomatic participants with GIRD to increase the IRROM. There is a scope for future studies to be done to investigate the effect of FM on symptomatic overhead athletes with GIRD.

Grounded running predominantly differs from traditional aerial running by having alternating single and double stance with no flight phase. Approximately, 16% of runners in an open marathon and 33% of recreational runners in a 5 km running event adopted a grounded running technique. Grounded running typically occurs at a speed range of 2–3 m·s−1, is characterised by a larger duty factor, reduced vertical leg stiffness, lower vertical oscillation of the centre of mass (COM) and greater impact attenuation than aerial running. Grounded running typically induces an acute increase in metabolic cost, likely due to the larger duty factor. The increased duty factor may translate to a more stable locomotion. The reduced vertical oscillation of COM, attenuated impact shock, and potential for improved postural stability may make grounded running a preferred form of physical exercise in people new to running or with low loading capacities (eg, novice overweight/obese, elderly runners, rehabilitating athletes). Grounded running as a less impactful, but metabolically more challenging form, could benefit these runners to optimise their cardio-metabolic health, while at the same time minimise running-related injury risk. This review discusses the mechanical demands and energetics of grounded running along with recommendations and suggestions to implement this technique in practice.

No abstract