Internal quality assurance in schools is essential because it pertains to a school's confidence in complying to national education standards and achieving a nation's national education goals. In the discussion of this study, it is crucial to determine the degree to which Education Quality Assurance in primary schools is based on comparable research findings. The approach used to evaluate several learning outcomes is the matching evaluation strategy. In addition, the utilised systematic review is a Narrative systematic review, which carefully picks and conducts with discretion what the researcher has written about a subject or problem. As a consequence of the study's results, it was established that the education system and schools are responsible for ensuring that all students meet the criteria and using their resources effectively and efficiently. Especially elementary school, which is the foundation of education. Academic Quality Assurance is essential for attaining academic quality (teaching and learning procedures and curriculum) and structural provision (buildings and physical facilities) in accordance with predefined objectives and standards.

The ease of business transactions offered by e-commerce services makes many companies compete with each other to offer attractive promos to consumers or the public so that they are interested in making transactions on their e-commerce services, one of the promos offered is by providing discounts or discounts in certain time or better known as flash sale. However, in practice, flash sales are often accompanied by very large discounts on a product, even reaching the price of Rp. 99, - (ninety nine rupiah). The price offered is very different from the market price that should be, this gives an indication of predatory pricing or selling at a loss carried out by e-commerce business actors. The problem that will be raised by the author is how the flash sale method is carried out by e-commerce business actors and how is predatory pricing law enforcement based on Law Number 5 of 1999 concerning Monopolistic Practices and Unfair Business Competition. The flash sale practice carried out by e-commerce business actors does not violate the provisions of Article 20 of Law Number 5 of 1999 concerning the Prohibition of Monopolistic Practices and Unfair Business Competition if the price offered is below the production price with the aim of expelling business competitors in the market the same time, and in the future raise prices as much as possible in order to cover losses and gain profits where the price increase causes losses for consumers.   Keywords: Flash Sale; Predatory Pricing; Business Competition.

Relationship among stakeholders in an industrial environment does not always run well. The conflicts within an industrial relationship are common, and they are known as industrial relation disputes. However, the disputes must be settled such as by mediation. This study aimed to analyze and investigate the 30 (thirty) day mediation period specified by Article 15 of the PPHI Law for the settlement of industrial relation disputes by the mediator. This study is a normative legal study utilizing a statutory approach and a case approach in which legal materials were gained through literature review. It was found that the settlement period must be completed by the mediator was ideally considering two aspects: the number of cases and the number of mediators. The researchers suggested that the provisions of Article 15 of the PPHI Law cannot be implemented equally; due to each region have the different number of cases and the number of mediators. In addition, the non-ideal number of functional mediators was taking into account the aspect of the number of cases received, so currently the service and technical implementation of the settlements do not run optimally. Based on the results of the study, the researcher suggests the stakeholders: first, to revise Article 15 of the PPHI Law, which is related to the period of time for the mediator in completing the duties. Second, to increase the number of functional mediators by considering the number of cases received.

Banking is one of the increasingly important economic sectors in Indonesia's economic development, especially in facing the era of free trade and globalization, both as an intermediary between the deficit sector and the supply sector as an agent of development. The planned merger of PT Bank Negara Indonesia Tbk and PT Bank Mandiri Tbk was also put forward by the then Minister of Finance with the aim of enlarging the scale of national banking so that it could be aligned with regional banks so that the Indonesian economy could grow the largest in the Association of South East Asia Nations (ASEAN). Although mergers are generally intended for business development based on increasing efficiency, it cannot be denied that mergers can also have consequences that can affect business competition. Other risks that can arise from the merger plan are financial conglomerates against adverse selection and moral hazard, given the excessive risk taking behavior. Judging from the data, in terms of regulations there is indeed no prohibition for banks in Indonesia to have a subsidiary. However, the practice of financial conglomeration has the potential to give birth to an unfair business competition.