To veil and wear a proper dress are among the commands of Allah to Muslim women, stipulated in several verses in the Quran. The term hijab or jilbab is the most important term related to that issue. In Indonesia, wearing a hijab is identical to Muslim women’s identity and reflects their piety. However, when one decides to unveil, the negative stigma is unavoidable. This article examines women’s perception of the Quran on veiling command based on two aspects. To begin with, the women’s understanding of the encouragement of wearing hijab and the women’s perception of the verses after deciding to put off their veil. In this study, the theory of religious piety and identity is applied as a conceptual framework and discursive analysis as a method of analysis. This study will present a discursive analysis of women’s understanding of the veiling concept. Particularly on their motivation for wearing hijab, veiling experience, and unveiling reason.

This research explain the techniques and quality assessment of the translation of washfi phrases in the novel Zeina's translation by Nawal El Saadawi. This research is a part of translation criticism by using the descriptive analysis method. This research uses a qualitative approach in analyzing translation techniques by applying Newmark's theory of translation techniques. In addition, a quantitative approach is also used in assessing the quality of translation by applying the theory of translation quality assessment by Nababan. The results of this research indicate that there are 348 data on washfi phrases in the novel Zeina and 40 data on washfi phrases in this study. The techniques used in translation are 10 of 16 Newmark translation techniques. The ten techniques are literal translation technique, transference, reduction, expansion, transposition, synonymy, modulation, naturalization, paraphrasing, and recognized translation technique. As for the assessment of translation quality, the most acceptable translation qualities were literal translation techniques and synonymy techniques (77%). Meanwhile, the lowest acceptance quality was naturalization technique, which was 62%. Then, the quality of easy / high readability is in the paraphrasing technique, which is 76%. While the quality of the lowest readability is naturalization technique, which is 46%.

This study aims to explain the techniques and assessment of the quality of the translation of imperative sentences in the book Al-Fatḥu Ar-Rabbānī Wal-Faiḍu Ar-Raḥmānī by Sheikh Abdul Qadir Al-Jaelani. This research is a part of translation criticism using the descriptive analysis method. This study uses a qualitative approach to analyzing translation techniques using Newmark's theory. In addition, a quantitative approach is also used in assessing the quality of translation by using the translation evaluation theory by Nababan. The results of this study indicate that there are 977 imperative sentence data and the sample data in this study are 50 imperative sentence data. In this study, it was found that there were 8 techniques used in translation from 16 Newmark translation techniques. The eight techniques are the literal translation technique, paraphrasing technique, transposition technique, common translation technique, expansion technique, synonymy technique, modulation technique, and reduction technique. In addition, the three highest acceptability qualities are literal translation technique, expansion technique, and modulation technique as much as 68%, while the lowest acceptability quality is synonymy technique as much as 56%. Then the readability quality with the highest score is in the literal translation technique and the transposition technique as much as 68%. At the same time, the readability quality with the lowest value is in the paraphrasing technique and the synonymy technique as much as 56%.