Wound closure after post-traumatic injuries and/or localized at peculiar body sites (head-and-neck, oral cavity, legs) are particularly challenging and can often be delayed due to local and systemic factors. In case of deep wounds and/or hard-to-heal wounds, grafting of dermal acellular matrices (ADM) is often needed. Though a great variety of synthetic and semisynthetic dermal and skin equivalents are available, viable human dermis, is still considered the most physiological alternative to replace the loss of autologous dermis, by acting as a physiological scaffold that add structural support to soft tissues. To date, human ADMs (hADMs) have been employed in the reconstruction of skin defects affecting almost all body sites, ranging from visceral sites to the skin and subcutaneous tissues. This review aims to investigate the use of hADM at different body sites and their peculiar advantages. A literature search was using the search terms "acellular dermal matrices", "dermal regeneration", "advances wound healing", "human acellular dermal matrices surgery". A total of 50 out of 150 papers was included. Based on the current body if evidence, hADMs appear to bring several advantages, such as: protection of deep structures (eg, tendons, bones, cartilage and nerves); stimulation of a functional new dermis (rather than a scar); reduction of wound closure time; control of pain and exudate. Finally, hADMs may represent the best treatment option for hard-to-heal wound not only in terms of efficacy and patient satisfaction bout also in terms of sanitary costs, especially across Europe, where hADMs cannot be commercialized as medical devices.

Summary Background Dermoscopy is the most widely used noninvasive imaging technique for the clinical diagnosis of melanoma (MM). Super‐high (× 400) magnification dermoscopy (D400) has recently been developed; compared with traditional dermoscopy, it can reveal additional features, down to the identification of single melanocytes in the skin. Objectives To evaluate which structures are visible at D400 and to compare them in atypical naevi and MMs. Methods A prospective observational multicentre study was conducted. We enrolled patients who were identified as having atypical melanocytic skin lesions by clinical and/or × 20 magnification dermoscopy (D20) examination, and who were assigned to either excision or follow‐up. Lesions were imaged by videodermoscopy at D20 and D400. The presence of pigmented cells and their features were assessed at D400. Results In total, there were 79 patients with 57 naevi and 31 MMs. Of the total 88 lesions, 63 (71.6%) were given a histological diagnosis, while the others were followed up for ≥ 12 months, during which they showed no change and were all diagnosed as naevi. Pigmented cells were identified in > 90% of the lesions at D400. Compared with naevi, MMs had a higher frequency of scattered, large, irregular (in shape and size), dendritic/roundish, violet/blue pigmented cells under D400 (P < 0.001). Moreover, dots (P < 0.01), out‐of‐focus blue structureless areas (P < 0.01) and vessels (P < 0.001) were also more frequent in MMs than in naevi at D400. Conclusions This study showed that D400 can reveal many elements not otherwise visible in traditional D20 dermoscopy, such as pigmented cells and their morphology, which could be useful for the diagnosis of MM.

No abstract

No abstract