Lingual fixed retainers and Hawley retainers had the longest survival times, followed by the COMBO retainers and vacuum-formed retainers. The reasons of failure were mainly mechanical (debond and fracture) and patient-related (loss).

No abstract

Objective: To assess the immediate response of lips in three dimensions (3D) resulting from simulated maxillary incisor advancement. Materials and Methods: Incremental maxillary incisor advancement was simulated by placing wax of increasing thickness (+2 mm, +4 mm, +6 mm) on the incisors of 20 participants, and the induced lip changes were recorded using 3D stereophotogrammetry. The induced displacement of lip landmarks was quantified using 3D image analysis software. Data were analyzed using a repeated-measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) after adjusting for age and sex of the study participants. Results: A large interindividual variation in lip response to simulated incisor advancement was observed. A significant overall effect on 3D lip changes was found for increasing values of simulated incisor advancement (F = 13.2; P < .001) as well as significant differences between anatomical landmarks of the lip (F = 7.4; P < .01). Most points moved outward and anterosuperiorly, except the midpoint and corners of the lip. Greatest movement was observed in the sagittal plane, followed by the vertical and transverse planes. Conclusions: Maxillary incisor advancement significantly affects upper lip change in three planes of space: particularly the anteroposterior plane, in which the response to simulated advancement appears to be nonlinear.

No abstract

With growing interest and patient awareness of facial aesthetics in the pursuit of orthodontic treatment, potential changes in facial soft tissues induced by orthodontic appliances demand elevated consideration. Facial soft tissues can be affected by the underlying hard tissues as well as orthodontic appliances placed in the oral cavity; in particular, lips play an important role in facial proportions and aesthetics. 1,2 A number of studies have investigated the perioral soft tissue changes at the end of orthodontic treatment (i.e. after debonding). 3,4 For example, a cephalometric study reported that the lower lip was