No abstract

Aim: To compare performance on a song recognition task of bilaterally combined electric and acoustic hearing (bimodal stimulation) with electric or acoustic hearing alone. Methods:Subjects were 14 adults with cochlear implants (CI) who continued to use a hearing aid (HA) in one/both ears. Subjects were asked to identify excerpts from 15 popular songs, which were familiar to them, presented in a random order via a single loudspeaker. Presentation conditions were fixed in order: bimodal, CI alone and then HA alone. Musical excerpts were presented in each condition with and then without lyrics. Results:In a subgroup of subjects (n = 8) with better low-frequency residual hearing (thresholds <85 dB hearing level (HL)), mean scores for bimodal stimulation were significantly greater than for CI alone. In addition, mean ‘no lyrics’ scores for HA alone (59.7%) were significantly greater than for CI alone (38.8%). All of these subjects considered bimodal stimulation to be the most enjoyable way to listen to music. For the remaining subjects (n = 6) there was no benefit from using bimodal stimulation over CI alone, and the majority of these preferred to listen to music using CI alone. Conclusions:Bimodal stimulation provides better perception of popular music, particularly melody recognition, compared to CI alone when low-frequency residual hearing is better than 85 dB HL.

Cisplatin induces ototoxicity in adult and pediatric population. Our aim was (1) to assess the protective effect of intratympanic injections of erdosteine in the prevention of cisplatin-induced ototoxicity and (2) to investigate inner ear protection using a scanning electron microscope. Ears of 20 Hartley guinea pigs were assigned to four subgroups and received an intratympanic injection of: E1-erdosteine 1.125 mg/cc, NS-normal saline, E2-erdosteine 2.25 mg/cc and E4-erdosteine 4.5 mg/cc. After 45 min, an intraperitoneal cisplatin injection of 3 mg/kg was performed and repeated 8 times, once a week to achieve 24 mg/kg. Auditory brainstem responses were recorded before any injection and after 24 mg/kg of cisplatin for the frequencies 1, 2, 4, 6 and 8 kHz. Cochleas were analyzed under scanning electron microscope. Average hearing loss in the NS subgroup was 29.8 dB which was lower than E1, E2 and E4 subgroups (40, 43.9, and 51.7 dB, respectively). Difference in the mean threshold increase was statistically significant between NS and the three erdosteine subgroups (P < 0.03). No difference was identified between E1 and E2 (P > 0.05). However, difference was significant between E1 and E4 (P < 0.02) and between E2 and E4 (P < 0.03); Electron microscopy revealed almost complete destruction of the stereocilia of the outer hair cells in all subgroups (NS, E1, E2 and E4). The ears treated with erdosteine showed a diffuse inflammatory reaction and osteitis of the middle ear. Low or high concentration of intratympanic erdosteine does not offer protection against cisplatin-induced ototoxicity as it causes a considerable inflammatory reaction.

No abstract

No abstract