Trends in the patterns of correlation between speech and music perception suggest that music patterns are differentially accessible to CI users. New processing strategies may improve this.

Normal-hearing subjects listening to acoustic simulations of cochlear implants (CI) can obtain sentence recognition scores near 100% in quiet and in 10 dB signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) noise with acute exposure. However, average sentence recognition scores for real CI listeners are generally lower, even after months of experience, and there is a high degree of heterogeneity. Our aim was to identify the relative importance and strength of factors that prevent CI listeners from achieving early, 1-mo scores as high as those for normal-hearing-listener acoustic simulations.Design: Sentence recognition scores (100 words/list, 65 dB SPL) using CI alone were collected for all adult unilateral CI listeners implanted in our center over a 5-yr period. Sentence recognition scores in quiet and in 10 dB SNR 8-talker babble, collected from 1 to 12 mo, were reduced to a single dependent variable, the "initial" score, via logarithmic regression. "Initial" scores equated to an improved estimate of 1-mo scores, and integrated the time to rise above zero score for poorer performing subjects. Demographic, device, and medical data were collected for 118 subjects who met standard CI candidacy criteria. Computed tomography of the electrode array allowing determination of the insertion depth as an angle, and the presence or absence of scala dislocation was available for 96 subjects. Predictive factors for initial scores were selected using stepwise multiple linear regression. The relative importance of predictive factors was estimated as partial r 2 with a low bias method, and statistical significance tested with type II analysis of variance. Results:The etiologies chronic otitis and autoimmune disease were associated with lower, widely variable sentence recognition scores in the long-term. More than 60% of CI listeners scored >50/100 in quiet at 1 mo. Congenital hearing loss was associated with significantly lower initial scores in quiet (r 2 0.23, p < 0.001), as was longer duration of hearing loss (r 2 0.12, p < 0.001, ˗0.76 pts per year). Initial scores were negatively correlated with insertion depth (r 2 0.09, p < 0.001, ˗0.1 pts per degree), with the highest initial scores being obtained for insertion depths of 300° to 400°. A much greater proportion of scala dislocations was found for perimodiolar arrays compared with straight arrays. Scores were negatively correlated with the proportion of the active electrode array found in scala vestibuli for Nucleus perimodiolar devices (r 2 0.14, p < 0.01, coefficient ˗25). Similar overall results were obtained for sentence recognition scores in noise (+10 dB SNR). The intercept value for the obtained regression functions indicated that CI listeners with the least limiting factors generally scored ~95/100 in quiet and ~90/100 in noise. In addition, CI listeners with insertion angles as low as 315° to 360° could obtain sentence recognition scores >80/100 even at 1 day after activation. Insertion depths of 360° were estimated to produce frequency-place mismatches of about one octave upward shift....

Aim: To compare performance on a song recognition task of bilaterally combined electric and acoustic hearing (bimodal stimulation) with electric or acoustic hearing alone. Methods:Subjects were 14 adults with cochlear implants (CI) who continued to use a hearing aid (HA) in one/both ears. Subjects were asked to identify excerpts from 15 popular songs, which were familiar to them, presented in a random order via a single loudspeaker. Presentation conditions were fixed in order: bimodal, CI alone and then HA alone. Musical excerpts were presented in each condition with and then without lyrics. Results:In a subgroup of subjects (n = 8) with better low-frequency residual hearing (thresholds <85 dB hearing level (HL)), mean scores for bimodal stimulation were significantly greater than for CI alone. In addition, mean ‘no lyrics’ scores for HA alone (59.7%) were significantly greater than for CI alone (38.8%). All of these subjects considered bimodal stimulation to be the most enjoyable way to listen to music. For the remaining subjects (n = 6) there was no benefit from using bimodal stimulation over CI alone, and the majority of these preferred to listen to music using CI alone. Conclusions:Bimodal stimulation provides better perception of popular music, particularly melody recognition, compared to CI alone when low-frequency residual hearing is better than 85 dB HL.

Of 487 cochlear implantations, 3.8% of adults and 4.5% of children underwent a revision surgery. The mean time to device failure was 7.6 years in children and 1.5 year in adults. Causes of revision were seven hard failures, four soft failures, and nine medical reasons. Among the medical reasons, four patients had skin flap infection associated with an extended endaural approach. Audiologic performances were stable or improved following reimplantation in 90% of cases. We had two cases of electrode array misplaced into the vestibular system.

Cochlear implantation in elderly patients is a questionable subject. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the procedure and its outcome, the postoperative course, and the audiologic and social benefits of cochlear implantation in this population. Twenty-seven patients older than 60 years were compared with a control group of 15 adult patients. This retrospective study analyzed data concerning the outcome of the procedure, postoperative course, postoperative orthophonic test results, and answers of a questionnaire assessing the changes in communication, perception, and social outcomes. The procedure was uneventful in both groups. Minor complications were not more frequent in elderly patients. Orthophonic test results were comparable in both groups. At 12 months, 83% of the elderly patients had an open-set speech discrimination score above 60%. The benefits of cochlear implantation in terms of the quality of life are not statistically different with younger patients. Cost-utility analysis might support these findings.