No abstract

Data from two research trials were used as inputs to a model to project the return to capital of two-phase alfalfa silage and pasture feeding systems for Holstein steers. This approach presents a methodology for applying research data over widely varying conditions. Cattle received a 40% (High = H), 22% (Medium = M), or 8% (Low = L) alfalfa silage diet or grazed an orchardgrass/ryegrass pasture (Pasture = P) during Period 1. During Period 2, cattle consumed a 90% concentrate diet until ultrasonic attenuation predicted that the longissimus muscle contained a small degree of marbling. All systems produced similar carcass grades, so profitability differences resulted from relationships between feed requirements, cost of feed, and cost of time. Cattle grazed on pasture yielded a higher return to capital during Period 1 and over the entire feeding system. Among the other systems, L returned more to capital during Period 1, but over the entire feeding system additional silage returned more when silage cost was less than $32 per 1.02 t (as fed). Above this cost, the continuous 90% concentrate diet yielded a higher return. Cattle implanted with trenbolone acetate and estradiol returned $60 in Trial 1 and $86 in Trial 2 more per animal than did unimplanted steers.