BACKGROUND: the inhibition of histone deacetylase (HDAC) has been reported as an effective mechanism on therapy in neoplastic diseases. Among HDAC inhibitors, Trichostatin A (TSA) and Valproic Acid (VPA) prevent the tumorigenesis in rodent and human models. Malformations as neural tube and axial skeletal defects are well-known VPA side effects. Recent hypotheses suggest the HDAC inhibitor activity as the teratogenic mechanism of VPA. The teratogenic potency of TSA is, at the moment, unknown. The aim of the present work is to investigate the HDAC inhibition on embryos exposed in utero to TSA or VPA and to compare the teratogenic potential of these two molecules on the axial skeleton morphogenesis. METHODS: Pregnant CD mice were i.p. treated on day 8 post coitum (9.00 a.m.) with 400 mg/kg VPA or with 0, 2, 4, 8, 16 mg/kg TSA. Embryos explanted 1 hr after the treatment from some females exposed to 400 mg/kg VPA or to 16 mg/kg TSA were processed for Western blotting and immunohistochemical analysis, in order to evaluate the histone hyperacetylation in the total embryo homogenates and to visualize the hyperacetylated tissues. Foetuses at term were processed for skeletal examination. RESULTS: Both VPA and TSA were able to induce hyperacetylation on embryos, specifically at the level of the caudal neural tube and of somites. At term, TSA showed teratogenic effects at the axial skeleton, quite similar to those observed after VPA exposure. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, both VPA and TSA are teratogenic in mice. A direct correlation between somite hyperacetylation and axial abnormalities could suggest the HDAC inhibition as the mechanism of the teratogenic effects. Birth Defects Res B 74:392-398, 2005. r 2005 Wiley-Liss Inc.

No abstract

No abstract

Histone deacetylases (HDACs) are nuclear and cytoplasmic enzymes that deacetylate a number of substrates, of which histones are the best known and described in the literature. HDACs are present in eukaryotic and bacteria cells, and are fundamental for a number of cellular functions, including correct gene expression. Surprisingly, only up to 20% of the whole genome is controlled by HDACs, but key processes for survival, proliferation, and differentiation have been strictly linked to HDAC enzyme functioning. The use of HDAC inhibitors (HDACi) has been proposed for the treatment of neoplastic diseases. Their effectiveness has been suggested for a number of liquid and solid tumors, particularly acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL). The role of HDACs in embryo development is currently under investigation. Published data indicate knockout phenotype analysis to be of particular interest, in which a number of HDACs play a key role during development. Little data have been published on the effects of HDACi on embryonic development, although for valproic acid (VPA), literature from the 1980s described its teratogenic effects in experimental animals and humans. To date, all tested HDACi have shown teratogenic effects similar to those described for VPA when tested in zebrafish, Xenopus laevis, and mice. HDACs were also able to alter embryo development in invertebrates and plants. A model, similar to that proposed in APL, involving retinoic acid receptors (RAR) and tissue specific Hox gene expression, is suggested to explain the HDAC effects on embryo development.

No abstract