No abstract

Background Advocacy is one of the core functions of public health and is a key tool for achieving Sustainable Development Goals. Public health associations play a key role in advocating for the development and implementation of strategies to prevent diseases and promote health and well-being. Objective This study aims to map out the focus of public health advocacy carried out by selected national public health associations over 4 years, between 2018 and 2021, in order to identify gaps and strengths and support associations and professionals in their advocacy efforts. Methods Twelve national public health associations participated in the study. Official policy documents produced between 2018 and 2021 were collected and analysed. The title and summary of the policy documents were examined line by line and coded into the main subject categories and themes. A qualitative thematic analysis was conducted. Policies were assessed from global and regional perspectives. Results A total of 220 policy documents were analysed. Overall, the largest number of policy documents came from high-income countries and dealt with environmental health and communicable diseases, including COVID-19, with, however, important differences among regions. In the African region, public health advocacy focused mainly on strengthening health systems; Europe and South America were mostly concerned with communicable diseases and pandemic management; and North America and the Western Pacific regions focused primarily on climate change. Limited attention was paid to international health and health as a human right in all regions. Conclusion Our study showed that, especially in high-income countries, public health associations actively engage in advocacy; however, more effort needs to be devoted to implementing a more international and intersectoral approach at the global level, anchored in health as a human right and aligned with the Sustainable Development Goals.

Background Healthcare systems have become complex and fragmented, negatively affecting healthcare access and navigation. This is especially the case for socio-economically vulnerable people, who encounter organisational and administrative hindrances trying to access care. These difficulties have worsened during Covid-19. Scholarly literature recognises that - by moulding navigation practices - social capital may mediate between potential and realised access to healthcare. However, little is known about how this mediating work practically unfolds. Methods This case study aimed to understand how social capital might affect healthcare navigation practices. To do so, we investigated how the People’s Health Lab (PHL), a community-based organisation, supported socio-economically vulnerable people in navigating healthcare during the Covid-19 pandemic in Bologna, Italy. Nine months of participant observation were conducted both in person and digitally from July 2020 to March 2021. Twelve semistructured interviews were also conducted with volunteers of the organisation. Fieldnotes and interview transcripts were analysed through Thematic Analysis. Results PHL support activities addressed barriers to healthcare navigation by vulnerable people, which were found to be services fragmentation, bureaucracy and Covid-19 restrictions. Volunteers of the PHL connected vulnerable individuals to health services in manifold, flexible ways, working without standard operative protocols and relying on informal personal contacts within public services. This was found to be key in enabling navigation of healthcare during the first three waves of the pandemic. Conclusions Our study provides evidence about how structural, linking social capital - the material and nonmaterial resources mobilised through the relationships between heterogeneous groups (the People’s Health Lab, health authorities and vulnerable people) - can mediate access to fragmented healthcare systems by shaping navigation practices. Key messages • Contemporary healthcare systems – including universal ones – have become complex and fragmented, posing access and navigation challenges to their users, especially those socio-economically vulnerable. • Linking social capital can mediate access to fragmented healthcare systems by flexibly mobilising material and nonmaterial resources through informal relationships between heterogeneous groups.