No abstract

Improving real‐life functioning is the main goal of the most advanced integrated treatment programs in people with schizophrenia. The Italian Network for Research on Psychoses previously explored, by using network analysis, the interplay among illness‐related variables, personal resources, context‐related factors and real‐life functioning in a large sample of patients with schizophrenia. The same research network has now completed a 4‐year follow‐up of the original sample. In the present study, we used network analysis to test whether the pattern of relationships among all variables investigated at baseline was similar at follow‐up. In addition, we compared the network structure of patients who were classified as recovered at follow‐up versus those who did not recover. Six hundred eighteen subjects recruited at baseline could be assessed in the follow‐up study. The network structure did not change significantly from baseline to follow‐up, and the overall strength of the connections among variables increased slightly, but not significantly. Functional capacity and everyday life skills had a high betweenness and closeness in the network at follow‐up, as they had at baseline, while psychopathological variables remained more peripheral. The network structure and connectivity of non‐recovered patients were similar to those observed in the whole sample, but very different from those in recovered subjects, in which we found few connections only. These data strongly suggest that tightly coupled symptoms/dysfunctions tend to maintain each other's activation, contributing to poor outcome in schizophrenia. Early and integrated treatment plans, targeting variables with high centrality, might prevent the emergence of self‐reinforcing networks of symptoms and dysfunctions in people with schizophrenia.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the degree of insight and resistance in a sample of obsessive-compulsive patients, and the predictive value of poor insight with respect to response to treatment with serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SRIs). Ninety-three patients fulfilling DSM-IV criteria for obsessive-compulsive disorder were evaluated. Seventy patients were treated with an SRI in a 24-week open-label trial. Sixteen percent of the patients did not recognize obsessions and compulsions as unreasonable or senseless. Fifty-two percent of the patients did not try to resist, 72% had little or no control over obsessions, and 64% were not able to exercise an effective control over compulsions. Patients with poor insight had a greater severity of obsessive-compulsive symptoms, a higher rate of schizophrenia spectrum disorders in their first-degree relatives and a higher frequency of a history of psychiatric disorders during childhood. Fifty-two percent of the patients with normal insight responded to SRIs, whereas none of the patients with poor insight were found to be responders. These results suggest the utility of the assessment of insight and resistance in obsessive-compulsive patients, also for the prediction of response to treatment with SRIs.

Although coercive measures have always been part of the psychiatric armamentarium, the ethical dilemma between the use of a "therapeutic" coercion and the loss of patients' dignity is one of the major controversial issues in mental health research and practice. The aims of the present review are to explore the existing literature on predictors of use of coercive measures and to explore the relationship between coercive measures and patient outcome. A literature search was conducted using MEDLINE, PsychyINFO, Scopus, Web of Knowledge and the Cochrane Database. In all selected papers, references were cross-checked to identify other possible eligible papers. The use of coercive measures was predicted by patients' clinical and socio-demographic features, staff characteristics and ward-related factors. Coercive measures have only a limited impact on patients' clinical and social outcome. At the current level of knowledge, coercion is still a controversial issue in mental health practice. Only few studies with a solid methodology have been carried out. Large multicenter and rigorous studies, with long-term follow-ups, are highly needed.

No abstract