Our study indicates that colicky infants have different patterns of gut microflora. Further studies are required to understand whether gut microflora is the primary cause of colics or its consequence.

Background: In the current SARS-Coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic little is known about SARS-CoV-2 in human milk. It is important to discover if breast milk is a vehicle of infection. Objective: Our aim was to look for the presence of SARS-CoV-2 RNA in the milk of a group of SARS-CoV-2 positive mothers from NorthWest Italy. Methods: This is a prospective collaborative observational study where samples of human milk from 14 breastfeeding mothers positive for SARS-CoV-2 were collected. A search of viral RNA in breast milk samples was performed by RT-PCR (Real-Time reverse-transcriptase-Polymerase-Chain-Reaction) methodology tested for human milk. All the newborns underwent a clinical follow up during the first month of life or until the finding of two sequential negative swabs. Results: In 13 cases the search for SARS-CoV-2 RNA in milk samples resulted negative and in one case it was positive. Thirteen of the 14 newborns were exclusively breastfed and closely monitored in the first month of life. Clinical outcome was uneventful. Four newborns tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 and were all detected in the first 48 h of life, after the onset of maternal symptoms. Also the clinical course of these 4 infants, including the one who received mother's milk positive for SARS-CoV-2, was uneventful, and all of them became SARS-CoV-2 negative within 6 weeks of life. Conclusion: Our study supports the view that SARS-CoV-2 positive mothers do not expose their newborns to an additional risk of infection by breastfeeding.

Human milk (HM) is a unique nourishment believed to contain biological factors contributing to both short and long-term benefits. Considering that a mother’s own milk is often considered the first choice for nutrition of neonates, an aspect of increased interest is the possible effect of diabetes on the mammary gland and therefore on breast milk composition. This article aims to review the published literature on this topic, and to offer additional insights on the role of this disease on the composition of HM. This review was performed by searching the MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINHAL and Cochrane Library databases. A total of 50 articles were selected, focused specifically on one of the two types of diabetes: gestational diabetes mellitus (21 studies) and insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (8 studies). Overall, the findings from the literature suggest that diabetes can alter the composition of HM. Nevertheless, the studies in this field are scarce, and the related protocols present some limitations, e.g., evaluating the variability of just a few specific milk biochemical markers in association with this syndrome.

Background: Colic, regurgitation and constipation are common feeding problems in formula‐fed infants that might benefit from dietary treatment. A formula containing fructo‐ and galacto‐oligosaccharides, partially hydrolysed proteins, low levels of lactose and palmitic acid in the β position and higher density has been tested to reduce the occurrence of these symptoms. The aim of this prospective study was to describe the effects of such a formula in infants with minor gastrointestinal disorders. Methods: An observational prospective trial involving practising Italian paediatricians was performed. Formula fed‐infants up to 90 d of age with minor gastrointestinal problems such as infantile colics and/or regurgitation and/or constipation were enrolled in the study from January 2001 to May 2001. The study was completed within 14 d of treatment. On days 1, 7 and 14 the infants were visited by the paediatricians. Parents were given a structured diary to record daily episodes of colic, regurgitation and type and number of stools. Results: Of the 932 infants enrolled, 604 completed the study. Of the 214 infants with colic, 169 (79%) demonstrated a reduction in frequency of colic from 4.1 ± 2.0 per day at the beginning of the study to 2.0 ± 1.8 at the end of the study (I.C. 95%: 1.72–2.39; p < 0.005). A reduction in the number of episodes of colic of 1.8 per day at the beginning of the study (I.C. 95%: 1.49–2.11; p < 0.05) was recorded between day 1 and day 7, and of 0.26 (I.C. 95%: 0.15–0.37; p < 0.05) between day 7 and day 14. Of the 201 infants with regurgitation problems, 141 (70%) demonstrated a reduction of frequency of the symptoms from 4.2 ± 2.0 per day at the beginningof the study to 2.1 ± 2.2 at the end of the study (I.C. 95%: 1.75–2.35; p < 0.005). A reduction of 1.87 in the number of regurgitation episodes was reported between day 1 and day 7 (I.C. 95%: 1.57–2.16; p < 0.05) and of 0.18 (I.C. 95%: 0.06–0.31; p < 0.05) between day 7 and day 14. Of the 232 infants with constipation, 147 (63%) demonstrated an increase in the daily number of stools of 0.42 (I.C. 95%: 0.5–0.3; p < 0.005). An increase in stool frequency of 0.41 (I.C. 95%: 0.51–0.23; p < 0.05) was reported between day 1 and day 7, and of 0.04 (I.C. 95%: 0.22–0.14; p= ns) between day 7 and day 14. Parents’evaluation of the formula was 7.9 ± 1.8 (score 0–10); 550 parents (91%) gave a positive judgement (score >6). The evaluation by the paediatricians of the improvement in symptoms after the treatment was 8.2 ± 1.5; 574 (95%) a positive effect (score >6). Conclusion: This study shows that the majority of infants followed by paediatricians for minor gastrointestinal symptoms improve within 2 wk of feeding with this new formula. Further double‐blind, controlled studies are needed to confirm whether the amelioration of symptoms observed in this trial is in fact due to the new formula.

Objectives:The purpose of the present randomized controlled clinical trial was to compare the use of donkey milk–derived fortifier (DF) with commercial bovine milk–derived fortifier (BF) in very preterm or very-low-birth-weight newborns, in terms of feeding tolerance.Methods:This trial included 156 newborns born at <32 weeks of gestational age and/or with a birth weight ≤1500 g. Newborns were randomized 1:1 to receive enteral feeding with either a BF-arm, or a new, DF-arm for 21 days. The fortification protocol was the same for both study arms, and the 2 diets were designed to be isoproteic and isocaloric. Feeding tolerance was assessed by a standardized protocol.Results:The risk of feeding intolerance tended to be lower in DF-arm than in BF-arm, with a relative risk reduction of 0.63 (95% confidence interval: −0.29, +0.90). The mean number of episodes per newborn of feeding intolerance and feeding interruptions (any duration) were consistently lower in the DF-arm than in the BF-arm. Episodes of bilious gastric residuals and vomiting were significantly lower in the DF-arm. Time needed to reach full enteral feeding (150 mL · kg−1 · day−1) and daily weight increase between the first day of exclusive enteral feeding (ie, without administering intravenous fluids) and discharge were similar in the BF- and DF-arms.Conclusions:These results suggest that DF improve feeding tolerance when compared with standard bovine-derived fortifiers, with a similar auxological outcome.