The present status of the pure line hypothesis Literature cited. Appendix-Soine important correlation tables. (3) Inheritance in the Asexual Reproduction of Centropyxis aculeata. (4) diverse strains, called "pure lines", "clones", or "biotypes", differing from each other, but each one constant and invariable in its c\"n hereditary constitution. This last idea, that every individual of any given clone is precisely the sane in its genetic make-up as any otVier individual of the same clone, is the basic idea of the pure line concept. As a corollary, it follov/s that all the variations four-d within .a single clone are piirely somatic and not heritable. In this case, it is evident,^.-election working witliin a clone could have no effect. The testing of this hypothesis, then, is of the greatest importance for any general consideration of t'ne mechanism of evolution. This problem has already attracted the attention of numerous investigators. 3ome have com.pletely comfirred the conclusions of Johannsen. Tiie more important of these papers have already been cited. But t?iere are others who have maintained that hereditary variations do occur within clones, and that selection withi.n a clone may have an effect. Pearson (1910), subjecting the data of the earlier pure line workers to a more accurate statistical analysis, found evidence indicating that such inheritance might exist. otout (1915), stocking U915), Middleton (1915), and Jennings (1916) have all succeeded in isolating, by selection, hereditarily diverse strains within single clones. The present paper adds another similar case to this list. Problems. Accepting, as we must, the fact that th.ere do exist, within a single species, diverse strains or races, there are two main problems which claim our attention.