Objectives: Urinary incontinence (UI) still remains one of the major functional complications after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP). As the cause for UI is multifactorial, it is quite difficult to make a prediction preoperatively. Considering intraoperative and postoperative risk factors, besides the preoperative ones, we designed an incontinence prediction model, administered 1 month after the surgery, in order to identify incontinent patients at 1 year. Patients and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 244 patients who underwent RARP at our institution. Only 209 patients had sufficient data, a 1-year follow-up and were continent preoperatively. The association of UI with the risk factors was assessed by univariable and multivariable regression models. Results: There was a 17.2% global UI rate at 1 year after RARP. Only age-adjusted Charlson comorbidity index, erectile function assessed by International Index of Erectile Function-5, prostate volume, nerve-sparing status and 24-hour urine loss at 1 month correlated with UI (p = 0.032, 0.009, 0.031, 0.018 and <0.001, respectively). The accuracy of the prediction model of UI was 92.8% (c-index), with an area under the curve of 91.9%. Conclusion: Age-adjusted Charlson comorbidity index, International Index of Erectile Function-5, prostate volume, nerve-sparing status and 24-hour urine loss at 1 month after RARP can predict an individual’s risk of UI at 1 year after RARP with good accuracy. Further external validation is required in order to generalize the use of this model.

Objectives: To assess the preoperative urodynamic predictors of urinary incontinence (UI) 1 year after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) and to design a nomogram capable of predicting its occurrence. Materials and Methods: Our prospective study included 58 previously continent patients who underwent RARP, in most cases, bilateral nerve-sparing and bladder neck preservation. A urodynamic examination including a urethral pressure profile was performed preoperatively. Multivariate analysis was used to assess the predictors for the need to use 1 or more pads/day and a nomogram was constructed. Results: There was a 20.6% incidence of UI at 1 year after RARP. Bladder compliance, maximum urethral closure pressure and the development of bladder outlet obstruction, correlated well with the incidence of UI on the multivariate analysis (p = 0.043, 0.001, and 0.05, respectively). Conclusion: Bladder compliance <27.8 ml/cm H₂O, maximum urethral closure pressure <50.3 cm H₂O and the bladder outlet obstruction are independent urodynamic factors correlating with UI after RARP. The new nomogram can objectively predict a patient likelihood of requiring 1 or more pads/day 1 year after RARP with a good accuracy.

The anatomic and functional outcomes of LH must be evaluated with imaging studies and nuclear scintigraphy to rule out structural abnormalities and functional impairment. An extensive dissection in the lower pole LH can lead to the upper moiety torsion after surgery.