Background Depression is one of the major psychiatric morbidities in cancer patients. The purpose of our study was to evaluate the impact of depressive symptoms in the quality of life (QoL) of patients with breast cancer undergoing chemotherapy and monoclonal antibodies treatments. Methods Observational, cross-sectional study conducted between April and November 2016. To evaluate the QoL, the EORTC QLQ-C30 and QLQ-BR23 questionnaire were used. The patients were screened for depressive symptoms using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS-D) and those with a positive HADS-D positive questionnaire were referenced to the Psychiatry and Mental Health Department for further assessment and follow-up. Results We included 45 female patients. Sixteen (35.6%) patients had a positive HADS-D questionnaire and depressive symptoms confirmed by a psychiatric physician. Of those patients, 7 (15.6%) had a major depressive episode confirmed by psychiatric interview. There was a significant association of depressive symptoms with the future perspectives scale ( p = 0.022), breast symptoms scale ( p = 0.011) and arm symptom scale ( p = 0.005). Significant differences were found in the fatigue ( p = 0.024), pain ( p = 0.037) and dyspnea ( p = 0.009) subscales being worse in patients with depressive symptoms. The association between having depressive symptoms or not was shown to be significant or marginally significant for the variables stage of the tumour ( p = 0.057), presence of distant metastasis ( p = 0.072) and previous diagnosis of depression ( p = 0.011). The patients treated with regimens containing monoclonal antibodies presented better outcomes in various subscales of the EORTC QLQ-C30 and QLQ-B23 questionnaires than those patients treated with chemotherapy regimens without monoclonal antibodies. Conclusions Despite the small sample of our study, this study provided evidence that depressive symptoms in patients with breast cancer undergoing chemotherapy and monoclonal antibodies treatments detrimentally reduced various aspects of QoL.

A woman aged 35 years was diagnosed with triple-negative breast cancer in October 2012. During the investigation, it was discovered that she was pregnant, the patient decided to have an abortion. She was submitted to a radical modified mastectomy and adjuvant chemotherapy followed by adjuvant breast radiotherapy of the left breast. 2 months after the adjuvant treatment, she began to have headaches and dizziness. The cranial MRI (head MRI) showed brain metastasis. She was then treated with whole brain radiotherapy, stereotactic radiosurgery and concomitant temozolomide which resulted in complete response. 1.5 year later, she was able to get pregnant and gave birth to a baby without complications. The previous imaging reassessment performed in September 2016 shows no evidence of recurrent breast cancer.

Aim of the study: To review mid-term results of multiple off-pump and on-pump CABG in octogenarians (OPCABG-ONCABG). Materials: In the period 2012–2017 87/888 (9,8%) patients undergoing isolated multiple CABG were octogenarians (81,7 ± 1,6 years). In particular 32/87 (36.78%) underwent OPCABG. After propensity score analysis, 29 OPCABG patients were matched with 29 ONCABG. Results: Mean number of grafts was respectively 2,6 ± 0,6 and 2,1 ± 0,3 in ONCABG and OPCABG group (p = 0,001). In-hospital mortality and perioperative MI did not occur. 1 ONCABG patient suffered from a stroke. IABP was implanted in 1 patient in each group. Intraoperative blood transfusions did not differ significantly in the 2 groups (respectively 18/29–62,1% and 14/29–48,3% in ONCABG and OPCABG, p = 0,2). 1 ONCABG patient needed surgical revision for excessive bleeding. Mean intubation time was respectively 9,2 ± 4,58 and 9,8 ± 3,64 hours in ONCABG and OPCABG group (p = 0,6). Mean stay in ICU did not differ in the 2 groups (p = 0,4). Severe AKI occurred in 1 ONCABG patient requiring haemodialysis. Follow-up was 77.6% complete. At a mean follow-up of 2.7 ± 1.5 years 41/45 patients are alive (2 non cardiac death for each group). In table 1 is reported Kaplan-Meyer cumulative survival curve. Only 2/41 patients had a new hospital admission for NSTEMI and 39/41 are angina free. Conclusion: OPCABG and ONCABG are safe procedures even in elderly patients. Postoperative complications seem to be less frequent in OPCABG patients, but the difference is not significant. OPCABG received significantly lower number of grafts, but this does not seem to influence survival and angina recurrence.

No abstract

A 66-year-old man was referred to the oncological pneumology consultation due to a mass in the right upper lobe observed in a routine X-ray of the chest. The CT scan confirmed a mass in the same location. The biopsy revealed a lung adenocarcinoma. It was decided to start chemotherapy adapted to kidney function. In April 2020, the patient contracted SARS-CoV-2 infection and developed bilateral pneumonia with partial respiratory failure. He was transferred to the intensive care unit, where he had a positive evolution. In the next 5 months, there was a clinical improvement; however, the CT scan of the chest showed disease progression. After a new multidisciplinary approach, it was decided to start a second line with atezolizumab. After four cycles of atezolizumab, there was a clear clinical improvement, and a reduction by more than 50% in the tumour size, without significant adverse effects.