summary In this paper, we have reviewed how the hydraulic design of trees influences the movement of water from roots to leaves. The hydraulic architecture of trees can limit their water relations, gas exchange throughout the crown of trees, the distribution of trees over different habitats and, perhaps, even the maximum height that a particular species can achieve. Parameters of particular importance include: (1) the vulnerability of stems to drought‐induced cavitation events because cavitation reduces the hydraulic conductance of stems, (2) the leaf specific conductivity‐of stems because it determines the pressure gradients and most negative water potentials needed to sustain evaporation from leaves, (3) the water storage capacity of tissues because this might determine the ability of trees to survive long drought periods. All of these parameters are determined by the structure and function of anatomical components of trees. Some of the ecological and physiological trade‐offs of specific structures are discussed.
Possible mechanical and hydraulic costs to increased cavitation resistance were examined among six co-occurring species of chaparral shrubs in southern California. We measured cavitation resistance (xylem pressure at 50% loss of hydraulic conductivity), seasonal low pressure potential (P min ), xylem conductive efficiency (specific conductivity), mechanical strength of stems (modulus of elasticity and modulus of rupture), and xylem density. At the cellular level, we measured vessel and fiber wall thickness and lumen diameter, transverse fiber wall and total lumen area, and estimated vessel implosion resistance using (t/b) h 2 , where t is the thickness of adjoining vessel walls and b is the vessel lumen diameter. Increased cavitation resistance was correlated with increased mechanical strength (r 2 5 0.74 and 0.76 for modulus of elasticity and modulus of rupture, respectively), xylem density (r 2 5 0.88), and P min (r 2 5 0.96). In contrast, cavitation resistance and P min were not correlated with decreased specific conductivity, suggesting no tradeoff between these traits. At the cellular level, increased cavitation resistance was correlated with increased (t/b) h 2 (r 2 5 0.95), increased transverse fiber wall area (r 2 5 0.89), and decreased fiber lumen area (r 2 5 0.76). To our knowledge, the correlation between cavitation resistance and fiber wall area has not been shown previously and suggests a mechanical role for fibers in cavitation resistance. Fiber efficacy in prevention of vessel implosion, defined as inward bending or collapse of vessels, is discussed.Among vascular plants, water is transported through xylem under negative pressure. Xylem must withstand both the mechanical stresses associated with negative pressure as well as the risk of air entering the hydraulic pathway. Failure to do so may lead to cavitation of water columns and blockage of water transport. Failure may occur when gas is pulled into water-filled xylem conduits from gas-filled cells or intercellular spaces through pores in the xylem pit membrane in a process referred to as air-seeding (Zimmermann, 1983;Baas et al., 2004). Failure may also occur when negative pressures overcome the ability of the xylem conduit walls to resist implosion (i.e. inward bending or collapse; Carlquist, 1975;Hacke et al., 2001a;Donaldson, 2002;Cochard et al., 2004;Brodribb and Holbrook, 2005). Implosion may trigger cavitation or, in leaves, may restrict hydraulic transport by reducing conduit diameter (Brodribb and Holbrook, 2005). In addition to negative pressures, freezing can lead to failure when sap in the xylem freezes and the gas dissolved in the sap comes out of solution. This can lead to cavitation upon thawing if the bubbles do not go back into solution but instead expand (Yang and Tyree, 1992). The result of cavitation is embolism or gas blockage, which reduces hydraulic transport and can result in reduced stomatal conductance (Pratt et al., 2005), reduced photosynthesis (Brodribb and Feild, 2000), and dieback of branchlets (Rood et al., 2000;Da...
Summary• Here, hypotheses about stem and root xylem structure and function were assessed by analyzing xylem in nine chaparral Rhamnaceae species.• Traits characterizing xylem transport efficiency and safety, mechanical strength and storage were analyzed using linear regression, principal components analysis and phylogenetic independent contrasts (PICs).• Stems showed a strong, positive correlation between xylem mechanical strength (xylem density and modulus of rupture) and xylem transport safety (resistance to cavitation and estimated vessel implosion resistance), and this was supported by PICs. Like stems, greater root cavitation resistance was correlated with greater vessel implosion resistance; however, unlike stems, root cavitation resistance was not correlated with xylem density and modulus of rupture. Also different from stems, roots displayed a trade-off between xylem transport safety from cavitation and xylem transport efficiency. Both stems and roots showed a trade-off between xylem transport safety and xylem storage of water and nutrients, respectively.• Stems and roots differ in xylem structural and functional relationships, associated with differences in their local environment (air vs soil) and their primary functions.
Resistance to xylem cavitation depends on the size of xylem pit membrane pores and the strength of vessels to resist collapse or, in the case of freezing-induced cavitation, conduit diameter. Altering these traits may impact plant biomechanics or water transport efficiency. The evergreen sclerophyllous shrub species, collectively referred to as chaparral, which dominate much of the mediterranean-type climate region of southern California, have been shown to display high cavitation resistance (pressure potential at 50% loss of hydraulic conductivity; P 50 ). We examined xylem functional and structural traits associated with more negative P 50 in stems of 26 chaparral species. We correlated raw-trait values, without phylogenetic consideration, to examine current relationships between P 50 and these xylem traits. Additionally, correlations were examined using phylogenetic independent contrasts (PICs) to determine whether evolutionary changes in these xylem traits correlate with changes in P 50 . Co-occurring chaparral species widely differ in their P 50 (À0.9 to À11.0 MPa). Species experiencing the most negative seasonal pressure potential (P min ) had the highest resistance to xylem cavitation (lowest P 50 ). Decreased P 50 was associated with increased xylem density, stem mechanical strength (modulus of rupture), and transverse fiber wall area when both raw values and PICs were analyzed. These results support a functional and evolutionary relationship among these xylem traits and cavitation resistance. Chaparral species that do not sprout following fire but instead recruit post-fire from seed had the greatest resistance to cavitation, presumably because they rely on post-fire survival of seedlings during the summer dry period to persist in the landscape. Raw values of hydraulic vessel diameter (d h ), maximum vessel length, and xylem-specific hydraulic conductivity (K s ) were correlated to P 50 ; however, d h , maximum vessel length, and K s were not correlated to P 50 when analyzed using PICs, suggesting that these traits have not undergone correlated evolutionary change. We found no difference in xylem traits between species occurring at freezing vs. nonfreezing sites, although freezing has been shown to affect the survival and distributions of some chaparral species. Stem mechanical strength, fiber properties, and post-fire regeneration type appear to be key factors in the evolution of cavitation resistance among chaparral shrubs.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.