No abstract

Phosphaturic mesenchymal tumors typically cause paraneoplastic osteomalacia, chiefly as a result of FGF23 secretion. In a prior study, we identified FN1-FGFR1 fusion in 9 of 15 phosphaturic mesenchymal tumors. In this study, a total of 66 phosphaturic mesenchymal tumors and 7 tumors resembling phosphaturic mesenchymal tumor but without known phosphaturia were studied. A novel FN1-FGF1 fusion gene was identified in two cases without FN1-FGFR1 fusion by RNA sequencing and cross-validated with direct sequencing and western blot. Fluorescence in situ hybridization analyses revealed FN1-FGFR1 fusion in 16 of 39 (41%) phosphaturic mesenchymal tumors and identified an additional case with FN1-FGF1 fusion. The two fusion genes were mutually exclusive. Combined with previous data, the overall prevalence of FN1-FGFR1 and FN1-FGF1 fusions was 42% (21/50) and 6% (3/50), respectively. FGFR1 immunohistochemistry was positive in 82% (45/55) of phosphaturic mesenchymal tumors regardless of fusion status. By contrast, 121 cases of potential morphologic mimics (belonging to 13 tumor types) rarely expressed FGFR1, the main exceptions being solitary

Hybrid oncocytic/chromophobe tumors (HOCT) of the kidney have been described in patients with Birt-Hogg-Dubé syndrome (BHD) and in association with renal oncocytosis without BHD. HOCT in patients without evidence of BHD or renal oncocytosis is exceedingly rare, and these cases have been poorly characterized. We have identified and studied 14 cases of HOCT from previously diagnosed renal oncocytomas (398 cases) and chromophobe renal cell carcinomas (351 cases) without evidence of BHD or renal oncocytosis. Immunohistochemical, ultrastructural, and molecular genetic studies analyzing numerical chromosomal changes, loss of heterozygosity for chromosome 3p, and mutation status of VHL, c-kit, PDGFR, and folliculin (FLCN) genes were performed. HOCTs were identified in nine men and five women (age range 40-79 years). The size of tumors ranged from 2 to 11 cm. All tumors displayed a solid alveolar architecture and were composed of cells with abundant granular eosinophilic oncocytic cytoplasm with perinuclear halos. Occasional binucleated neoplastic cells were present, but irregular, hyperchromatic, wrinkled (raisinoid) nuclei were absent. The cytoplasm contained numerous mitochondria of varying sizes, but only sparse microvesicles with amorphic lamellar content were found. Tumors were positive for CK7 (12/14), AE1-AE3 (14/14), anti-mitochondrial antigen (14/14), E-cadherin (11/13), parvalbumin (12/14), and epithelial membrane antigen (14/14). Tumors were generally negative for racemase, CK20, CD10, and carboanhydrase IX. Interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization revealed multiple chromosomal losses and gains with a median of four (range 1-9) chromosomal aberrations per case. Monosomy of chromosome 20 was common and found in 7 of 14 cases. Monosomy of chromosomes 6 and 9 was present in 4 of 14 cases each, of which two cases displayed monosomy for both chromosomes 6 and 9. Polysomy of chromosomes 10, 21, and 22 was found in 4/14 cases each, of which one case displayed polysomy for all these three chromosomes. No pathogenic mutations were found in the VHL, c-kit, PDGFR, and folliculin (FLCN) genes. (1) We have shown that hybrid oncocytic/chromophobe tumors of the kidney do occur, albeit rarely, outside the Birt-Hogg-Dubé syndrome and without associated renal oncocytosis. (2) These tumors constitute a relatively homogenous group with histomorphologic features of both chromophobe renal cell carcinoma and renal oncocytoma. (3) Sporadic hybrid oncocytic/chromophobe renal tumors are characterized by multiple numerical aberrations (both mono- and polysomies) of chromosomes 1, 2, 6, 9, 10, 13, 17, 21, and 22 and lack of mutations in the VHL, c-kit, PDGFRA, and FLCN genes. (4) The tumors seem to behave indolently as no evidence of malignant behavior was documented in our series, although admittedly, the follow-up was too short to fully elucidate the biological nature of this rare neoplasm. At worst, these tumors could have a low malignant potential, which only can be found out with longer follow-up.