Gland destruction by inflammatory infiltrates, followed by replacement of the stromal component in symptomatic BPH may be induced by the down-regulation of the MIC-1 gene.

Brain metastases from prostate cancer are rare in postmortem examinations, and even rarer in clinical series. We report an unusual case of brain metastasis from prostate cancer confirmed by antemortem diagnosis in a 72-year-old man. The metastatic brain tumor was surgically resected and the patient was kept stable for more than 19 months after diagnosis of the brain metastasis.

No abstract

The authors performed cavernous nerve reconstruction by nerve grafting in 22 patients (unilateral-16, bilateral-6) between August 2001 and June 2004. Harvesting of the sural nerve was unexpectedly more difficult than nerve grafting in the extremities or the head and neck, because a knee and lumbar bending position was impossible due to the pelvic surgical field. Suture of the grafted nerve on the distal side required great effort, because there was only sufficient space for one hand at the maximum in a deep region of the pelvic cavity, and the nerve ends easily become invisible by inflow of even a small amount of urine or blood. The mean time of the nerve harvesting and grafting was 1 hr 50 min for unilateral grafting and 2 hr 40 min for bilateral grafting. Recovery of erectile function was observed in about half the patients who had undergone surgery nearly 1 year before. Since harvesting of the sural nerve and nerve grafting were more difficult than expected, modification and improvement of many surgical elements, such as improvement of surgical devices and application of endoscopic techniques, are necessary.

Aim:We prospectively investigated health-related quality of life (HR-QOL), including sexual function and sexual bother, in patients who underwent nerve grafting during a radical prostatectomy in comparison with those who underwent a non-nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy. Methods: Between August 2001 and May 2004, radical prostatectomies were performed on 69 patients with clinical T1-T2N0/M0 prostate cancer. Of these, 66 patients (22: nerve-grafting patients, 44: non-nerve-sparing and non-nerve-grafting patients) were enroled into this study. The observation periods ranged from 12-46 months (median: 29 months). The general HR-QOL was measured with the SF-36 General Health Survey and disease-specific HR-QOL was measured with the University of California Los Angeles-Prostate Cancer Index. Results: Penile tumescence was observed in 11 out of 15 (73.3%) prostate-specific antigen failure-free patients who underwent unilateral nerve grafting with contra-lateral nerve-sparing or bilateral nerve grafting. Vaginal penetration was observed in six out of 15 (40.0%) patients. The time for partial erection and for intercourse, respectively, ranged from 3-21 months (median = 6 months) and 6-36 months (median = 13.5 months). There were no significant differences in general HR-QOL changes over time between the nerve-grafting patients and the patients without any nerve-preserving procedures. The sexual function score was significantly better in the nerve-grafting (bilateral nerve graft or unilateral nerve graft with contra-lateral nerve-sparing) patients than in the non-nerve-sparing/non-nerve-grafting patients. The sexual bother score, however, was more serious for the patients who underwent nerve-grafting surgery than for the non-nerve-sparing/non-nerve-grafting patients. Conclusion: Sexual bother is serious for patients who attempt to maintain sexual function after special surgical procedures, such as nervegrafting surgery. We should be aware that careful counseling is needed to avoid impatient and excessive hope for the recovery of sexual function.