Objectives A few studies on antibody testing have focused on asymptomatic or mild coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients with low initial anti-severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) antibody responses. Anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody-testing performance was evaluated using blood samples from asymptomatic or mild COVID-19 patients. Methods Blood samples were collected from 143 COVID-19 patients during an outbreak on a cruise ship 3 weeks after diagnosis. Simultaneously, a follow-up SARS-CoV-2 genetic test was performed. Samples stored before the COVID-19 pandemic were also used to evaluate the lateral flow immunochromatographic assay (LFA) and electrochemiluminescence immunoassay (ECLIA). Titers of anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgM and IgG antibodies against the nucleocapsid and spike proteins were measured using the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay to confirm which antibodies were influenced on LFA- and ECLIA- false-negative result in crew-member samples. Results Sensitivity, specificity, positive-predictive, and negative-predictive values of LFA-detected IgM antibodies were 0.231, 1.000, 1.000, and 0.613, respectively; those of LFA-detected IgG antibodies were 0.483, 0.989, 0.972, and 0.601, respectively; and those of ECLIA-detected total antibodies were 0.783, 1.000, 1.000, and 0.848, respectively. All antibody titers measured using ELISA were significantly lower in blood samples with negative results than in those with positive results in both LFA and ECLIA. In the patients with negative results from the follow-up genetic testing, IgM-, IgG-, and total-antibody positivity rates were 22.9%, 47.6%, and 72.4%, respectively. Conclusions These findings suggest that anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody testing has lower performance in asymptomatic or mild COVID-19 patients than required in the guidelines.

A c c e p t e d M a n u s c r i p t SummaryPhenotypic detection of extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL) is important for public health and infection control; however, plasmid-mediated AmpC β-lactamases (pAmpCs) can interfere with the ESBL-phenotyping. We focused on Enterobacteriaceae strains which were susceptible to cefepime but had mildly-elevated MIC of ceftazidime, and studied the impact of pAmpC on the ESBL-phenotyping in this population. Genotyping of ESBL and pAmpC were performed on 528 clinical isolates of Escherichia coli, Klebsiella spp., and Proteus spp. with ceftazidime MIC of ≥2 μg/mL and cefepime MIC ≤8 μg/mL, which were collected in the Nagasaki University Hospital from January 2005 to March 2011. In this population, 145 isolates (27.5%) were positive for pAmpC (pAmpC group). The concordance rates of phenotypic and genotypic detection of ESBLs were 69.2% in the pAmpC group and 88.8% in the non-pAmpC group (P = 0.04). pAmpC was more commonly detected in isolates with non-CTX-M genes (5/53, 9.4%) than in isolates with CTX-M genes (8/121, 6.6%). Our data support that the presence of pAmpC increases the false negative detection of ESBL. When ESBL-phenotyping is used, the underestimation of ESBL-producers should be taken into account.

Background Hemolysis during blood drawing is a common cause of laboratory artifacts. Although circulating cell-free tumor DNA and fetal DNA are currently measured in routine practice, the effect of in vitro hemolysis on the measurement of cell-free DNA (cfDNA) has not been investigated. When in vitro hemolysis occurs, cellular DNA could be released from damaged white blood cells and reduce the fraction of circulating tumor DNA and fetal DNA. Methods Blood from healthy individuals was collected and passed through a narrow needle to cause in vitro hemolysis. Plasma was separated before and after mechanical damage, and concentrations of free hemoglobin and cfDNA of 2 reference genes were measured. Results cfDNA of 2 reference genes and free hemoglobin increased after mechanical damage. A clear correlation between cfDNA and free hemoglobin was observed. Conclusion cfDNA concentrations are higher in hemolyzed plasma. Therefore, the fraction of circulating tumor DNA and fetal DNA can be underestimated in plasma hemolyzed by inappropriate blood collection techniques.

Background A few studies on antibody testing have focused on asymptomatic or mild coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients with low initial anti-severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) antibody responses. Anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody-testing performance was evaluated using blood samples from asymptomatic or mild COVID-19 patients. Methods Blood samples were collected from 143 COVID-19 patients during an outbreak on a cruise ship 3 weeks after diagnosis. Simultaneously, a second SARS-CoV-2 genetic test was performed. Samples stored before the COVID-19 pandemic were also used to evaluate the lateral flow immunochromatographic assay (LFA) and electrochemiluminescence immunoassay (ECLIA). Titers of anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgM and IgG antibodies against the nucleocapsid and spike proteins were measured using the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay to compare false-negative- with positive-result samples. Results Sensitivity, specificity, positive-predictive, and negative-predictive values of LFA-detected IgM antibodies were 0.231, 1.000, 1.000, and 0.613, respectively; those of LFA-detected IgG antibodies were 0.483, 0.989, 0.972, and 0.601, respectively; and those of ECLIA-detected total antibodies were 0.783, 1.000, 1.000, and 0.848, respectively. IgM-, IgG-, and total-antibody positivity rates in the patients with negative results from the second genetic testing were 22.9%, 47.6%, and 72.4%, respectively. All antibody titers, especially those of the IgG antibody against nucleocapsid protein, were significantly lower in blood samples with false-negative results than in those with positive results. Conclusions These findings suggest that anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody testing has lower performance in asymptomatic or mild COVID-19 patients than required in the guidelines, and situations in which it is useful are limited.

Background SARS-CoV-2 seroepidemiological studies are used to guide public health decision making and to prepare for emerging infectious diseases. Disease occurrence estimates are limited in the Philippines, the country with the highest reported number of coronavirus disease-related deaths in the Western Pacific region. We aimed to estimate SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence and infection rate among outpatient clinic attendees in Metro Manila prior to the implementation of the national coronavirus disease vaccination program. Methods We conducted repeated cross-sectional surveys at the animal bite clinic in San Lazaro Hospital, Manila, the Philippines across four periods, 3 months apart, between May 2020 and March 2021. Multivariable logistic regression was used to assess associations between different characteristics and infection status including seropositivity. Results In total 615 participants were enrolled, ranging from 115 to 174 per period. Seroprevalence quadrupled between the first (11.3%) and second (46.8%) periods and plateaued thereafter (third—46.0%, fourth—44.6%). Among seropositive participants, total antibody concentration was comparable throughout the first to third periods but declined between the third and fourth periods. Infection prevalence was comparable across enrollment periods (range 2.9–9.5%). Post-secondary education [aOR 0.42 (95% CI 0.26, 0.67)] was protective, and frontline work [aOR 1.81 (95% CI 1.18, 2.80)] was associated with increased odds of seropositivity. Frontline work status [aOR 2.27 (95% CI 1.10, 4.75)] and large household size [aOR 2.45 (95% CI 1.18, 5.49)] were associated with increased odds of infection. Conclusions The quadrupling of seroprevalence over 3 months between the first and second enrollment periods coincided with the high burden of infection in Metro Manila in early 2020. Our findings suggest a limit to the rise and potential decline of population-level SARS-CoV-2 infection-induced immunity without introduction of vaccines. These results may add to our understanding of how immunity develops against emerging infectious diseases including coronaviruses.