No abstract

Aims: It was the aim of this study to perform a review of the clinical features, treatments and outcomes of patients with idiopathic sclerosing orbital inflammation (ISOI) in Taiwan. Methods: All patients with histologically confirmed ISOI from 1995 to 2007 at the National Taiwan University Hospital were included. We reviewed the medical charts to see the clinical presentation, treatment modalities, treatment efficacy and final clinical status of these patients. Results: Six male and 3 female patients ranging in age from 33 to 82 years were included. The most common symptoms were pain and blurred vision (both 77.8%). Reduced visual acuity and proptosis were the most common signs (both 89%). Five patients received oral steroid treatment with/without pulse therapy combined with tissue removal, the response to which was good in 1 patient and partially effective in the other 4 patients. One patient received oral steroids and surgery, followed by radiotherapy, with only partial response. Patients with oral prednisolone or surgery only all had poor responses. Conclusion: ISOI is rare and also difficult to diagnose and manage. Early intervention with steroids/immunosuppressants combined with surgical debulking procedures may result in control or regression of this recalcitrant disease.

SmartPlug-related complications, including canaliculitis and granuloma pyogenica, required long-term follow-up. Most of the complications can be cured by lacrimal irrigation of antibiotics.

Purpose To determine current institutional practice patterns for the use of perioperative antibiotics and other measures to prevent infection after cataract surgery in Asia. Methods An online survey-based study of leading eye institutions in China, Hong Kong, India, Indonesia, Japan, Malaysia, Pakistan, Philippines, Singapore, South Korea, Taiwan, Thailand and Vietnam was conducted. The survey was administered to 26 representative key opinion leaders from prominent tertiary eye institutions that are also national academic teaching institutions in Asia. Survey responses were collated and anonymized during analysis. Results All surveyed institutions used povidone iodine for the preoperative antiseptic preparation of the eye, with notable variations in the concentration of povidone iodine used for conjunctival sac instillation. Preoperative topical antibiotics were prescribed by 61.5% and 69.2% of institutions in low-risk and high-risk cases, respectively. Regarding the use of intra-operative antibiotics, 60.0% and 66.7% of institutions administered intracameral antibiotics in low-risk and high-risk patients, respectively. Postoperative topical antibiotics use patterns were generally very similar in low-risk and high-risk patients. Over half of the institutions (52.2% and 68.0% in low-risk and high-risk patients, respectively) also indicated prolonged postoperative use of topical antibiotics (> 2 weeks). Not all surveyed institutions had established policies/protocols for perioperative antibiotic use in cataract surgery, endophthalmitis surveillance, and/or a monitoring program for emerging antimicrobial resistance. Conclusion There are variations in antimicrobial prophylaxis approaches to preoperative, intra-operative and postoperative regimens in cataract surgery in Asia. More evidence-based research is needed to support the development of detailed guidelines for perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis to reduce postoperative infections.