Eighty-four Holstein cows were assigned to a randomized block experiment to determine effects of supplementing pre- and postpartum diets containing highLys protein supplements with rumen-protected Met and Lys. Before parturition, cows received a basal diet with 1) no rumen-protected amino acids (AA), 2) 10.5 g/d of Met from rumen-protected Met, or 3) 10.2 g/d of Met and 16.0 g/d of Lys from rumen-protected Met plus Lys. After parturition, cows continued to receive AA treatments but switched to diets balanced for 16.0 or 18.5% crude protein (CP). Diets were corn-based; supplemental protein was provided by soybean products and blood meal. Cows received treatments through d 105 of lactation. Compared with basal and Met-supplemented diets, Met + Lys supplementation increased yield of energy-corrected milk, fat, and protein, and tended to increase production of 3.5% fat-corrected milk. Significant CP x AA interactions were observed only for milk protein and fat content. Supplementation of the 16% CP diet with Met and Met + Lys had no effect on milk true protein and fat content. However, Met and Met + Lys supplementation of the 18.5% CP diet increased milk protein content by 0.21 and 0.14 percentage units, respectively, and Met supplementation increased fat content by 0.26 percentage units. Results of this study indicate that early-lactation cows fed corn-based diets are responsive to increased intestinal supplies of Lys and Met and that the responses depend on dietary CP concentration, supply of metabolizable protein, and intestinal digestibility of the rumen-undegradable fraction of supplemental proteins.
Lactation diets based on wilted alfalfa silage and heated whole soybeans are common in the midwestern US. We examined the milk production response of multiparous Holstein cows to the addition of ruminally protected methionine at two percentages to a basal total mixed ration. An additional total mixed ration included both methionine and lysine supplementation. Sixteen Holstein cows in early lactation were used in a replicated 4 x 4 Latin square design with 21-d periods. Milk production, milk composition, and dry matter intake were determined for the last 5 d of each period. Milk production (41.5 kg/d), dry matter intake (25.9 kg/d), and milk fat concentration (3.26%) were unaffected by the supplementation of amino acids. The addition of methionine increased milk protein concentration and yield linearly. Each gram of methionine increased milk protein yield by 4 g, and milk protein concentration increased from 2.89 to 2.99% with the addition of 10.5 g/d of methionine. The proportion of casein N in total milk N was unaffected by treatment. The addition of lysine did not elicit a response. Total mixed rations based on alfalfa haylage, heated soybeans, and animal proteins were clearly limited by their methionine content but were adequate in their lysine content.
Five multiparous, ruminally and duodenally cannulated Holstein cows were assigned to 5 x 5 Latin squares at wk 2 (experiment 1), wk 11 to 13 (experiment 2), and wk 17 to 19 postpartum (experiment 3) to determine extent of Met limitation. Treatments were duodenally infused and consisted of 10 g/d of l-Lys plus 0, 3.5, 7.0, 10.5, or 16.0 g/d of dl-Met in experiments 1 and 2 and 8 g/d of l-Lys plus 0, 5, 10, 15, or 20 g/d of dl-Met in experiment 3. Calculated Lys contributions to total AA (TAA) in duodenal digesta for control treatments were 8.6, 7.5, and 9.0% for experiments 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Methionine contributions to TAA for the 5 infusion treatments were 1.9, 2.1, 2.2, 2.4, and 2.7% for experiment 1; 2.1, 2.3, 2.4, 2.5, and 2.7% for experiment 2; and 1.8, 2.0, 2.2, 2.4, and 2.5% for experiment 3, respectively. Milk protein yield increased linearly in experiments 1 and 2, indicating that Met contribution to TAA in duodenal digesta for maximal milk protein synthesis exceeded 2.7 for early-lactation cows. In experiment 2, a quadratic relationship was found between level of infused Met and milk protein content, with the response reaching a plateau when 12.2 g of Met was infused, corresponding with a Met contribution to TAA in duodenal digesta of 2.4%. In experiment 3, milk protein content increased quadratically, but milk yield declined linearly with increasing levels of infused Met; hence, milk protein yield was unaffected by treatment. The calculated plateau point of the milk protein content response curve was determined to be 12.4 g of infused Met, which corresponds to a Met contribution to TAA in duodenal digesta of 2.3%. Experiment 3 results indicate that the required level of Met in duodenal digesta for maximizing milk protein yield is lower than that required for maximizing milk protein content.
Sixty multiparous Holsteins were used in a 200-d continuous lactation trial designed to measure the response to a mixture of ruminally protected Met and Lys. Response to AA was determined at two dietary concentrations of degraded protein designed to provide 85 and 100% of NRC recommended amounts. This difference in degraded protein content was achieved by addition of urea. Diets without urea supported lactation as well as diets with added urea in early lactation. In midlactation, urea addition was detrimental to yields of milk and milk protein; addition of AA prevented this negative effect. In early lactation, AA addition raised milk protein concentration and yield by 1 g/kg of milk of 37 g/d and did not interact with urea. Increases in protein concentration in response to AA addition were similar in early and late lactation and corresponded to changes in the casein fraction of milk. These results support previous work showing the importance of adequate absorbable Lys and Met to maximize the protein content of milk. The results suggest that interactions may occur between ruminal ammonia production and AA supply.
One hundred forty-four cull cows (body condition score = 2.10 ± 0.61; BW = 456 ± 47 kg) were organized into a 2 × 2 factorial design (48 pens, 12 pens/treatment, and 3 cows/pen) to evaluate the effect of dietary roughage level and oral drenching of Megasphaera elsdenii NCIMB 41125 (M. elsdenii culture; Lactipro Advance; MS Biotec Inc., Wamego, KS) on performance and carcass characteristics. Cattle were finished over a 42-day realimentation period, and aggressively stepped up over a 10-day period to either a high roughage finisher (HRF; 25% roughage) or a low roughage finisher (LRF; 10% roughage). Within diet, cattle were administered no probiotic or 100 mL of M. elsdenii culture (M. elsdenii NCIMB 41125, 2 108 cfu/mL) on day 0. No diet × probiotic interactions were detected (P ≥ 0.15), suggesting that the magnitude of the response was not influenced by the concentrate level of the diet. The main effect of diet triggered several significant responses. Decreasing roughage level tended to improve average daily gain (ADG) by 9.7% (0.26 kg, P = 0.08), while decreasing dry matter intake (DMI) by 0.9 kg (P = 0.09), provoking a 19.7% enhancement of feed efficiency (0.036 units, P < 0.01). However, interim data revealed declines of performance parameters among both diets with a significant difference between treatments only documented during the final phase of the realimentation period. During the final 14 days, LRF posted a 0.68 kg increase in ADG (P = 0.05) and a 2.0 kg decrease in DMI (P = 0.01), translating to improved feed efficiency (0.054 units, P = 0.03). This suggests that increasing the caloric density of finishing diets may help offset the regression of performance typically observed following a compensatory gain. No carcass traits were impacted by either diet or M. elsdenii culture (P ≥ 0.08). Overall, oral drenching of M. elsdenii culture tended to augment ADG (0.26 kg, P = 0.08) and carcass ADG (0.20 kg, P = 0.10). Implying that M. elsdenii culture was effective at alleviating the acidosis risk prompted by the rapid step-up period employed in the trial and may help capitalize on the narrow timeline of compensatory gain in cull cow realimentation.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.