Objectives: Much recent debate has focused on the merits of differential discounting of costs and health effects. Yet relatively little attention has been paid to the merits of using discount rates that are time-dependent (i.e. non-constant). Recent theory shows that appropriate discount rates depend upon the real rate of borrowing. Since this is determined by the bond market, and since real yields differ on bonds of different maturity, this implies that discount rates ought to be non-constant. Recent research has also demonstrated that conventional objections to nonconstant discounting, such as the risk of time-inconsistency, may no longer hold. Our objective is to shed light on this under-researched topic and to ignite a debate about the merits of non-constant discounting. MethOds: We review the theoretical and empirical literature around the use of non-constant discounting, consider whether non-constant discounting is appropriate for social decision making, and (if so) propose how decision makers can incorporate non-constant discounting in a way that is time-consistent and which accounts for intergenerational equity and other social value considerations. We also consider, and propose solutions to, technical hurdles associated with adopting non-constant discounting. Results: The conventional approach to discounting (using a constant rate) is appropriate only in special cases where specific assumptions are adopted. In general, non-constant discounting is preferable. Recent work has overcome both the theoretical and technical hurdles to the adoption of non-constant discounting cOnclusiOns: Decision makers should reconsider their existing discounting methodology to ensure that it is compatible with their perspective on social choice, any budget constraints faced, and other considerations. Where non-constant discounting is found to be appropriate, it should be embraced by decision makers.
PRM31 exPlicative Model of the health exPendituRe foR contRibutive health SubSySteM PoPulation in coloMbia
A907tratamento de eventos adversos ocorridos na amostra foram comparados entre os dois grupos. Results: Características do grupo UPI: 51,3% sexo feminino, média de idade 63,17 anos (DP= 16,66) e média de tempo de internação de 12,83 dias (DP = 13,36). Características do grupo UEF: 50% do sexo feminino; média de idade de 61,22 anos (DP= 15,98) e média de 8,70 dias de internação (DP= 11,20) Foram identificados 9,2% eventos adversos por admissão e 72% destes ocorreram na UEF. O tempo médio de internação 21,7 dias (p< 0,05) e a média de idade 64,1 anos (p> 0,05) foram comparativamente maiores nas internações com evento Foram considerados evitáveis 87,1% dos eventos adversos e as categorias de dano mais frequentes foram as de menor gravidade. Aproximadamente 71% do custo total das internações que apresentaram evento adverso representam gastos com diárias extras e procedimentos corretivos. No grupo UEF o gasto com eventos adversos foi 36% maior do que no grupo UPI. ConClusions: A porcentagem maior de eventos encontrado na UEF sugerem que novas formas de gestão, como a UPI, devem ser consideradas para redução de eventos adversos e seus custos.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.