SUMMARYThe number of Aphis fabae Scop. per plant and per acre developing on field beans (Vicia faba L.) was inversely related to seeding rate (i.e. plant density) except sometimes at very low rates; with equal numbers of plants per acre, fewer aphids developed on plants in rows 11 in. than 22 in. apart.Plots sown in mid‐March with more than about 150,000 plants per acre were more attractive than less dense stands to colonizing alate A. fabae, but established colonies multiplied most on the sparsest and least on the densest plots.The number of plants per acre infected by pea leaf‐roll virus was inversely related to planting density. There were more virus‐infected plants on II in. than on 22 in. spaced rows‐in contrast to the numbers of A. fabae. A single spray with demeton‐methyl, timed to control A. fabae, did not significantly decrease virus incidence.Grain yields of sprayed plots were little altered by increasing the seed rate above a critical minimum, except in one year when the densest crops lodged. Increased yields from spraying were closely related to the numbers of A. fabae on unsprayed plots. Dense planting (more than 400,000 plants per acre) prevented or greatly decreased losses caused by A. fabae in unsprayed plots except in one year when the aphids were exceptionally abundant.
Different traps were compared to find the type most suitable for studying aphid vectors of plant viruses quantitatively.A Moericke water trap caught more aphids than a flat sticky trap of equal area. A flat sticky trap (930 sq. cm.) caught half as many aphids as a cylindrical trap (945 sq. cm.), which caught about one‐third as many as a water trap (1200 sq. cm.) or a Johnson suction trap (9 in. fan) when operated at between 2 and 3 ft. over bare soil.Yellow traps caught proportionally more Tuberculoides annulatus, and in summer more Capitophorus species than a suction trap, but significantly fewer Anoecia corni, Sitobium spp. and Pemphigus bursarius. Traps with a level surface caught proportionally more Brevicoryne brassicae, Aphis fabae and Myzus persicae, but fewer Anoecia corni and Drepanosiphum plantanoides than vertical cylindical traps. Attraction by colour influences the catch on horizontal traps more than on cylindrical traps because there is less impaction by the wind.Only suction traps indicate the number of aphids per unit volume of air and are non‐selective, but they are expensive and require an electric power supply. Water traps effectively catch those aphids that are attracted to yellow, but they require frequent attention. Sticky traps catch fewer aphids than either suction or water traps, but they can be left unattended for about 2 weeks. Flat sticky traps catch aphids likely to land on a crop, and cylindrical traps show when aphids are in the air, but not if those aphids are able or wanting to land. For routine work cylindrical sticky traps have other advantages; they are cheap and do not require skilled handling, and their catches of alate Myzus persicae have been correlated with the spread of some plant viruses.
Mangold clamps are over-wintering sources of the aphid-transmitted beet mosaic, beet yellows and beet mild yellowing viruses, and of several species of aphid, three of the most common in clamps being Myxuspersicae, Rhopalosiphoninus staphyleae tulipaellus and R. latysiphon. This study attempted to assess the relative importance of the different species in spreading viruses from clamps. Compared with M. persicae, R. s. tulipaellus and R. latysiphon are seldom trapped in flight, except near large infestations. Alatae of M. persicae and N. s. tulipaellus become common in clamps in April, but few fly below 15' C., a temperature seldom reached in eastern England in early spring. Flight muscle autolysis, which occurs later in R. s. tulipaellus and R. latysiphon than
SUMMARYPartial regression equations were calculated that relate the mean percentage of plants infected with yellowing viruses (beet yellows and beet mild yellowing viruses) in sugar‐beet crops at the end of August to the number of days during January, February and March when temperatures fell below – 0.3 °C (31‐5 °F) and the mean temperatures in April, for the 21 yr, 1951–71, using weather records from Rothamsted Experimental Station. Regression analyses were also made to find the effect of other factors including mean and minimum temperatures for the same months, and also mean counts of ‘green aphids’, mainly of the vector Myzus persicae, on sugar‐beet plants during May and June. Significant relationships were established with all factors, but ‘frost‐days’ and April mean temperatures accounted for the greatest percentage of the variance in yellows incidence.The calculations were made separately for the years from 1951 to 1958, when no routine advice was given to farmers about aphid control, and 1959–71 when a ‘spray‐warning scheme’ was in operation, and many crops were sprayed at critical times to prevent aphid‐ and virus‐spread. Weather factors had the same effects in both periods, but for any particular weather less virus was spread in the second period than in the first, although there were sufficient aphids, i.e. the numbers expected from the prevailing weather conditions. There was no evidence that insecticide treatment used in any one year affected aphid‐incidence in subsequent years.Regression analyses on weather variables were also calculated separately for each of seventeen beet‐sugar factory collection‐areas, using weather records from local weather stations, and also the Rothamsted weather records. Unexpectedly, the fit of the regressions was always better with Rothamsted weather data than with local weather records. Mean yellows‐incidence for the different factory areas declined from south to north, and there was a linear relationship with the square root of the latitude above 50 °C. At the same time the correlation coefficients relating yellows‐incidence to ‘frost‐days’ became smaller and less significant, and those showing dependence
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.