In coiled-coil (CC) protein structures α-helices wrap around one another to form rope-like assemblies. Most natural and designed CCs have two–four helices and cyclic (Cn) or dihedral (Dn) symmetry. Increasingly, CCs with five or more helices are being reported. A subset of these higher-order CCs is of interest as they have accessible central channels that can be functionalised; they are α-helical barrels. These extended cavities are surprising given the drive to maximise buried hydrophobic surfaces during protein folding and assembly in water. Here, we show that α-helical barrels can be maintained by the strategic placement of β-branched aliphatic residues lining the lumen. Otherwise, the structures collapse or adjust to give more-complex multi-helix assemblies without Cn or Dn symmetry. Nonetheless, the structural hallmark of CCs—namely, knobs-into-holes packing of side chains between helices—is maintained leading to classes of CCs hitherto unobserved in nature or accessed by design.

The association of amphipathic a helices in water leads to a-helical-bundle protein structures. However, the driving force for this-the hydrophobic effect-is not specific and does not define the number or the orientation of helices in the associated state. Rather, this is achieved through deeper sequence-to-structure relationships, which are increasingly being discerned. For example, for one structurally extreme but nevertheless ubiquitous class of bundle-the a-helical coiled coils-relationships have been established that discriminate between all-parallel dimers, trimers and tetramers. Association states above this are known, as are antiparallel and mixed arrangements of the helices. However, these alternative states are less-well understood. Here, we describe a synthetic-peptide system that switches between parallel hexamers and various updown-up-down tetramers in response to single-amino-acid changes and solution conditions. The main accessible states of each peptide variant are characterized fully in solution and, in most cases, to high resolution with X-ray crystal structures. Analysis and inspection of these structures helps rationalize the different states formed. This navigation of the structural landscape of a-helical coiled coils above the dimers and trimers that dominate in nature has allowed us to design rationally a well-defined and hyperstable antiparallel coiled-coil tetramer (apCC-Tet). This robust de novo protein provides another scaffold for further structural and functional designs in protein engineering and synthetic biology. ASSOCIATED CONTENT Supporting Information The Supporting Information is available free of charge on the ACS Publications website. Supporting Figures and Tables (PDF) Crystal-Structure Files The crystal structures are all available from the Protein Data Bank using the following accession codes:

We describe de novo-designed α-helical barrels (αHBs) that bind and discriminate between lipophilic biologically active molecules. αHBs have five or more α-helices arranged around central hydrophobic channels the diameters of which scale with oligomer state. We show that pentameric, hexameric, and heptameric αHBs bind the environmentally sensitive dye 1,6-diphenylhexatriene (DPH) in the micromolar range and fluoresce. Displacement of the dye is used to report the binding of nonfluorescent molecules: palmitic acid and retinol bind to all three αHBs with submicromolar inhibitor constants; farnesol binds the hexamer and heptamer; but β-carotene binds only the heptamer. A co-crystal structure of the hexamer with farnesol reveals oriented binding in the center of the hydrophobic channel. Charged side chains engineered into the lumen of the heptamer facilitate binding of polar ligands: a glutamate variant binds a cationic variant of DPH, and introducing lysine allows binding of the biosynthetically important farnesol diphosphate.

Our ability to design completely de novo proteins is improving rapidly. This is true of all three main approaches to de novo protein design, which we define as: minimal, rational and computational design. Together, these have delivered a variety of protein scaffolds characterised to high resolution. This is truly impressive and a major advance from where the field was a decade or so ago. That all said, significant challenges in the field remain. Chief amongst these is the need to deliver functional de novo proteins. Such designs might include selective and/or tight binding of specified small molecules, or the catalysis of entirely new chemical transformations. We argue that, whilst progress is being made, solving such problems will require more than simply adding functional side chains to extant de novo structures. New approaches will be needed to target and build structure, stability and function simultaneously. Moreover, if we are to match the exquisite control and subtlety of natural proteins, design methods will have to incorporate multi-state modelling and dynamics. This will require more than black-box methodology, specifically increased understanding of protein conformational changes and dynamics will be needed.

Homo- and hetero-dimeric coiled coils as scaffolds for the presentation of α-helical protein-binding motifs.