In this study, Fe-12.50Mn-1.10C-1.70Cr-0.40Mo-0.40Si-0.50(max)P-0.50(max)S (Hadfield alloy) and Fe-28.4Mn-0.86C-1.63Al-0.42Cu-1.80Mo-1.59Si-0.60W (Fermanal alloy) (Wt. %) in the aged condition were compared in terms of its tribological and microstructural properties. The x-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns were refined with the lines of the austenitic γ -phase, Chromium Iron Carbide (Cr 2 Fe 14 C), Iron Carbide (Fe 2 C), and Iron Oxide (Fe 0.974 O (II)) for the Hadfield alloy, and the lines of the austenitic γphase, martensite (M), Mn 1.1 Al 0.9 phase and iron carbide (Fe 7 C 3 ) for the Fermanal alloy. Mössbauer spectra were fit with two sites for the Hadfield alloy, which displayed as a broad singlet because of the austenitic disordered phase, and had a magnetic hyperfine field distribution, which corresponds to the Cr 2 Fe 14 C ferromagnetic carbides found by XRD. There were two paramagnetic sites, a singlet, which corresponds to the austenite disordered phase, and a doublet, which can be attributed to the Fe 7 C 3 carbide. The obtained Rockwell C hardness for aged Hadfield and Fermanal alloys were 43.786 and 50.018 HRc, respectively.

The long-term performance of steels is affected by the simultaneous actions of wear and corrosion, known as tribocorrosion. The tribocorrosion behavior of fully austenitic steels: Fe-Mn-xAl-C (x = 0, 3.5 and 8.3 wt.%) in Ringer’s solution was investigated by using a pin on disk tribometer adapted with a three-electrode corrosion cell. Open circuit potential and coefficient of friction evolution as well as polarization curves were measured. Corrosion rates were calculated by the Tafel extrapolation method, and wear rates were calculated by using a linear profilometer. Pure and total wear rates were higher for the 3Al alloy due to the greater precipitation and embedded calcium minerals, hydroxides, and oxides on the surface, to the detachment of the deformed layer and its adhesion to the counterbody. Additionally, the 8Al alloy exhibited the lowest tendency to corrosion and corrosion rate and the greatest synergistic effect, indicating that this alloy is more sensitive to this effect than the other alloys. For the three materials, the change in the wear rate due to corrosion had a greater contribution to the synergy than the change in corrosion rate due to wear and the damage in the materials was derived mainly from pure mechanical wear.