Conclusion-This study suggests that the pathogenesis of intestinal metaplasia at the SCJ is not uniform: at an endoscopically unremarkable SCJ it is a sequela of H pylori gastritis, but coexisting with endoscopic features of Barrett's oesophagus it is associated with male sex and gastrooesophageal reflux disease. (Gut 1998;43:17-21)

No abstract

Aim: To evaluate the Helicobacter pylori stool antigen (HpSA) test in the assessment of H. pylori infection and the effect of omeprazole treatment on its accuracy. Methods: Study 1: 140 dyspeptic patients were enrolled in the study and defined as H. pylori positive if histology and rapid urease test, or culture alone were positive. HpSA was performed on all patients and 13C‐urea breath test (UBT) on 87. Study 2: 75 patients testing positive using both UBT and HpSA, were given omeprazole 20 mg for 2 weeks (Group A) or omeprazole 40 mg for 2 weeks (Group B), or OAC for 1 week (group C). A Helicobacter pylori stool antigen test was performed on all patients on days 3, 5, 7 and 14 during treatment, and also on days 7 and 14 post‐treatment in groups A and B. UBT was performed in groups A and B on days 7 and 14 during treatment, and days 7 and 14 post‐treatment. Results: 80/140 patients were H. pylori positive. The sensitivity and specificity of HpSA were 93.8 and 90%, similar to UBT (93.9 and 92.1%). Omeprazole significantly reduced both HpSA and UBT values, resulting in a decreased accuracy. Of 25 patients receiving 20 mg omeprazole, HpSA gave 5 and 6 false negatives after 7 and 14 days treatment respectively, while UBT gave 4 and 7 false negatives after 7 and 14 days treatment. Of 25 patients receiving 40 mg omeprazole, HpSA gave 7 and 9 false negatives after 7 and 14 days of treatment, while UBT gave 8 and 9 false negatives after 7 and 14 days of treatment. Two weeks after stopping omeprazole treatment, the HpSA and UBT were positive in all cases. Conclusions: The Helicobacter pylori stool antigen test is valuable in the assessment of H. pylori infection. Short‐term omeprazole treatment decreases the accuracy of both HpSA and UBT in a similar manner.

No abstract

Aim: To test the appropriateness of referrals for upper gastrointestinal endoscopy in Campania, Italy, using the criteria of the Maastricht Consensus. Patients: Patients undergoing endoscopy during a 1‐week period in 21 Endoscopy Services were considered prospectively. The reasons for endoscopy were dyspeptic symptoms, history of peptic ulcer and assessment after treatment. The age, sex, symptoms, history of peptic ulcer (previous endoscopic or radiographic examinations and treatment), endoscopic diagnosis and H. pylori status were recorded. The indications for endoscopy were evaluated according to the Maastricht guidelines. Results: Two hundred and sixteen of 706 patients presented with reflux symptoms, 430 with dyspeptic symptoms, 38 with alarm symptoms and 22 with atypical symptoms. Endoscopy was normal in 376 cases (53.2%); duodenal ulcer was found in 219, gastric ulcer in 45, oesophagitis in 82 and gastric cancer in six. All patients with cancer were older than 45 years, and four presented with alarm symptoms. In 398 cases (56%), endoscopy was considered not to be indicated: 250 patients with a previous diagnosis of ulcer without a change in symptoms, 38 patients in order to confirm eradication and 110 patients younger than 45 years with dyspepsia without alarm symptoms. Conclusions: A large number of endoscopic examinations could be avoided by following the guidelines of the Maastricht Consensus. In order to reduce endoscopic workload, strategies for educating physicians should be pursued.