Our aim was to compare the need for analgesics/drugs of abuse between headache patients--chronic and episodic headache sufferers--and addicts, by the Leeds Dependence Questionnaire (LDQ). This is a self-completion 10-item instrument to measure dependence upon a variety of substances. We administered the LDQ questionnaire to 122 chronic daily headache (CDH) sufferers who had been taking one dose of analgesic drug every day for at least 1 year; 71 subjects suffering from episodic headache (EH) using analgesics only occasionally; 115 consecutive drug addicts (DA) with a diagnosis of substance dependence. The mean LDQ total score was similar in the CDH (11.58+/-6.35) and DA (10.37+/-6.51) groups, and for both it was significantly higher than the score in the EH (5.61+/-3.00) group (P<0.001). The CDH group had the highest scores, and higher scores than the DA group (Z=-8.18, P<0.001) in item 8, assessing the primacy of effect over the kind of analgesic used, and in item 10 (Z=-5.03, P<0.001), asking if it is difficult to live without the analgesic; the DA group had the highest scores, and higher scores than the CDH group, in item 9 (Z=-5.07, P<0.001) addressing the need for the continued administration of the drug to maintain well-being, and in item 3 (Z=-2.39, P<0.05), exploring compulsion to start the use of the drug. The EH group had lower scores in all items (P<0.05) except for item 9, where there was no difference from CDH group; the EH group had also lower scores (P<0.001) than the DA group, except for item 8, where, instead, the score was higher than in the DA group (Z=-5.33, P<0.001). A strong link develops between chronic headache patients and the analgesics they use. This sort of 'dependence' appears to be a consequence of headache, originating from the necessity for the analgesic to cope with everyday life.
Our aim was to study and compare pharmacoepidemiology of headache treatment in two different settings: inside and outside a specialized Centre. We analysed the differences in headache treatment between 612 subjects admitted for the first visit ('naive') (F/M: 2.41; mean age = 37.31 +/- 14.09 years) and 620 subjects admitted for a control visit (F/M: 3.18; mean age = 44.30 +/- 15.37 years) to the Headache Centre of the University of Modena and Reggio Emilia. Most patients suffered from migraine. As acute treatment, on the first visit, 49.4% of them were taking drugs prescribed by a doctor; 41.5% were taking over-the-counter analgesics (OTCAs); 9.1% were not taking any drug. On the control visit, 81.3% of patients were taking prescription drugs; 15.8% OTCAs; 2.9% were not taking drugs (overall chi-square = 139.229, P < 0.001). Non-selective analgesics were the most-used drugs. Triptans were used by 9.1% of 'naive' patients and by 31.8% of patients attending for the control visit (Fisher's Z = 7.655, P < 0.001). Nimesulide was the most-used drug. A prophylactic treatment was made by 16.8% of 'naive' patients, and by 58.2% of patients admitted to the control visit (Fisher's Z = 12.135, P < 0.001). Antidepressants were the class of drugs most used for prophylaxis. Amitriptyline was the drug for prophylaxis most frequently used by patients attending the control visit, while flunarizine was the most frequently used by 'naive' patients. Before being examined in a specialized centre, few patients take prescription drugs, triptans, or prophylactic drugs; specialized care increases the proportion of patients taking prophylactic drugs, and changes the type of acute treatment used into disease-specific medication for headache.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.