Coronary CT angiography (CTA) is currently considered a reliable method to exclude obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) before valvular heart surgery in patients with low pretest probability. However, its role in excluding obstructive CAD before transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is less well established. Single-center retrospective study where patients with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis underwent both CTA and invasive coronary angiography (ICA) as part of TAVI planning. CTA exams were conducted on a 64-slice dual source scanner, with a median interval of 45 days to ICA (IQR 25–75 [13–82]). In both tests, obstructive CAD was defined as a ≥50% stenosis in an epicardial vessel ≥2 mm diameter. Per-patient, per-vessel and per-proximal segment analyses were conducted, excluding and including non-evaluable segments. The study included 200 patients (120 women, mean age 83 ± 6 years). The prevalence of obstructive CAD on ICA was 35.5% (n = 71). On a per-patient analysis (assuming non-evaluable segments as stenotic), CTA showed sensitivity of 100% (95% CI, 95–100%), specificity of 42% (95% CI, 33–51%), and positive and negative predictive values of 48% (95% CI, 44–51%) and 100% (95% CI, 92–100%), respectively. CTA was able to exclude obstructive CAD in 54 patients (27%), in whom ICA could have been safely withheld. Despite the high rate of inconclusive tests, pre-procedural CTA is able to safely exclude obstructive CAD in a significant proportion of patients undergoing TAVI, possibly avoiding the need for ICA in roughly one quarter of the cases.

No abstract

Background Vascular complications increase morbidity and mortality in transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). A collagen plug-based closure device - MANTA® was recently introduced as an alternative to the suture-mediated ProGlide® vascular closure device (VCD). Data regarding the efficacy and safety comparing both VCD is scarce. The present study sought to compare the effectiveness of both devices. Methods Single center retrospective analysis on prospectively collected data of 300 consecutive patients who underwent TAVI using MANTA® or ProGlide® since 2018. A 1:1 propensity-score matched population derived by a multivariate logistic regression model based on age, sex, body mass index, pre-procedural haemoglobin, EuroSCORE II, main access calcification and the sheath-to-artery ratio. The primary endpoint was the composite of major or life-threatening bleeding (VARC-2 definition), femoral artery stenosis/dissection, pseudoaneurysm and need for endovascular/surgical bailout intervention. Results The propensity score matching resulted in 129 matched pairs. The median age was 84 years old [IQR 80–87], 42% males with a median EuroSCOREII of 4.29% [IQR 3.05–6.24]. There were no differences in the primary endpoint between MANTA ® and ProGlide® cohorts (3.9% vs 7.8%, p=0.287, respectively). The rates of the primary endpoint with the MANTA® device decreased with center experience, with relatively steep learning curve effect concerning device success. Major or life-threatening bleeding (3.1% vs 5.4%, p=0.540) and pseudoaneurysm (0.8% vs 2.3%, p=0.622) occurred less frequently in MANTA® cohort, but the differences did not reach statistical significance. Endovascular (stent or balloon) or surgical rescue intervention (9.3% vs 5.4%, p=0.341) and femoral artery stenosis/dissection (6.2% vs 3.1%, p=0.376), were also similar rates. In ProGlide® cohort, to achieve VCD success (without primary endpoint events), 15.5% needed more than 2 devices, significantly different from MANTA ® (p<0,001). Conclusions In patients undergoing transfemoral TAVI, the MANTA® VCD showed a similar efficacy and safety compared to the ProGlide® device and it reduced significantly the need of additional VCDs for completion of hemostasis. These results were obtained despite a clear learning curve associated with MANTA. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None

No abstract

No abstract