In order to gain some insight into those structural features that control M1 selectivity, a selected set of pirenzepine analogues has been studied in which both the tricyclic ring system and the basic side chain have been varied. Binding studies were conducted in rat tissue homogenates from cerebral cortex (M1) and gastric fundus (M2). The ratio of IC50 values of the test compounds in the two different tissues was taken as a measure of M1 receptor selectivity. Several derivatives, especially those with flexible side chains, i.e. high degree of freedom of rotation around single bonds, proved to be nonselective. Among semirigid compounds only those containing 6-membered ring systems (11, 13, 14, and 15) showed significant M1 selectivity. Principles of structure-activity and structure-selectivity are discussed.
The M1-selective antiulcer drug pirenzepine (1) is a tricyclic compound with close resemblance to tricyclic psychotropic agents such as imipramine (2). Despite this fact, pirenzepine is devoid of any psychotropic effects, exhibiting measurable antagonistic effects in biochemical assays and receptor binding studies only toward the muscarinic receptor system. To understand how different groups in these tricyclic molecules affect binding affinities, a set of nine compounds structurally related to pirenzepine (1) and imipramine (2) has been selected for analysis, comprising three different tricycles and three different side chains. The compounds were tested for their affinity to the imipramine and muscarinic receptors in homogenized rat cortex tissue. The result of these studies suggests that it is the nature and placement of accessory groups that determine the differences in receptor recognition and the binding process. In the case of pirenzepine (1), preferential binding toward the muscarinic receptor is brought about by the endocyclic amide group, by the positioning of the protonated N atom of the side chain, and to a minor extent by the exocyclic amide group. From these findings a putative model for the explanation of selective binding of pirenzepine (1) to the muscarinic receptor has been derived.
Purpose
Whether myocardial inflammation causes long-term sequelae potentially affecting myocardial blood flow (MBF) is unknown. We aimed to assess the effect of myocardial inflammation on quantitative MBF parameters, as assessed by 13N-ammonia positron emission tomography myocardial perfusion imaging (PET-MPI) late after myocarditis.
Methods
Fifty patients with a history of myocarditis underwent cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging at diagnosis and PET/MR imaging at follow-up at least 6 months later. Segmental MBF, myocardial flow reserve (MFR), and 13N-ammonia washout were obtained from PET, and segments with reduced 13N-ammonia retention, resembling scar, were recorded. Based on CMR, segments were classified as remote (n = 469), healed (inflammation at baseline but no late gadolinium enhancement [LGE] at follow-up, n = 118), and scarred (LGE at follow-up, n = 72). Additionally, apparently healed segments but with scar at PET were classified as PET discordant (n = 18).
Results
Compared to remote segments, healed segments showed higher stress MBF (2.71 mL*min−1*g−1 [IQR 2.18–3.08] vs. 2.20 mL*min−1*g−1 [1.75–2.68], p < 0.0001), MFR (3.78 [2.83–4.79] vs. 3.36 [2.60–4.03], p < 0.0001), and washout (rest 0.24/min [0.18–0.31] and stress 0.53/min [0.40–0.67] vs. 0.22/min [0.16–0.27] and 0.46/min [0.32–0.63], p = 0.010 and p = 0.021, respectively). While PET discordant segments did not differ from healed segments regarding MBF and MFR, washout was higher by ~ 30% (p < 0.014). Finally, 10 (20%) patients were diagnosed by PET-MPI as presenting with a myocardial scar but without a corresponding LGE.
Conclusion
In patients with a history of myocarditis, quantitative measurements of myocardial perfusion as obtained from PET-MPI remain altered in areas initially affected by inflammation.
Graphical abstract
CMR = cardiac magnetic resonance; PET = positron emission tomography; LGE = late gadolinium enhancement
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.