Successful modern generalized gradient approximations (GGA's) are biased toward atomic energies. Restoration of the first-principles gradient expansion for exchange over a wide range of density gradients eliminates this bias. We introduce PBEsol, a revised Perdew-Burke-Ernzerhof GGA that improves equilibrium properties of densely-packed solids and their surfaces.

No abstract

No abstract

We present the case for the nonempirical construction of density functional approximations for the exchange-correlation energy by the traditional method of "constraint satisfaction" without fitting to data sets, and present evidence that this approach has been successful on the first three rungs of "Jacob's ladder" of density functional approximations [local spin-density approximation (LSD), generalized gradient approximation (GGA), and meta-GGA]. We expect that this approach will also prove successful on the fourth and fifth rungs (hyper-GGA or hybrid and generalized random-phase approximation). In particular, we argue for the theoretical and practical importance of recovering the correct uniform density limit, which many semiempirical functionals fail to do. Among the beyond-LSD functionals now available to users, we recommend the nonempirical Perdew-Burke-Ernzerhof (PBE) GGA and the nonempirical Tao-Perdew-Staroverov-Scuseria (TPSS) meta-GGA, and their one-parameter hybrids with exact exchange. TPSS improvement over PBE is dramatic for atomization energies of molecules and surface energies of solids, and small or moderate for other properties. TPSS is now or soon will be available in standard codes such as GAUSSIAN, TURBOMOLE, NWCHEM, ADF, WIEN, VASP, etc. We also discuss old and new ideas to eliminate the self-interaction error that plagues the functionals on the first three rungs of the ladder, bring up other related issues, and close with a list of "do's and don't's" for software developers and users.

We assess the performance of recent density functionals for the exchange-correlation energy of a nonmolecular solid, by applying accurate calculations with the GAUSSIAN, BAND, and VASP codes to a test set of 24 solid metals and nonmetals. The functionals tested are the modified Perdew-Burke-Ernzerhof generalized gradient approximation ͑PBEsol GGA͒, the second-order GGA ͑SOGGA͒, and the Armiento-Mattsson 2005 ͑AM05͒ GGA. For completeness, we also test more standard functionals: the local density approximation, the original PBE GGA, and the Tao-Perdew-Staroverov-Scuseria meta-GGA. We find that the recent density functionals for solids reach a high accuracy for bulk properties ͑lattice constant and bulk modulus͒. For the cohesive energy, PBE is better than PBEsol overall, as expected, but PBEsol is actually better for the alkali metals and alkali halides. For fair comparison of calculated and experimental results, we consider the zeropoint phonon and finite-temperature effects ignored by many workers. We show how GAUSSIAN basis sets and inaccurate experimental reference data may affect the rating of the quality of the functionals. The results show that PBEsol and AM05 perform somewhat differently from each other for alkali metal, alkaline-earth metal, and alkali halide crystals ͑where the maximum value of the reduced density gradient is about 2͒, but perform very similarly for most of the other solids ͑where it is often about 1͒. Our explanation for this is consistent with the importance of exchange-correlation nonlocality in regions of core-valence overlap.