Lesson study (LS) is a professional development practice that has mainly remained conducted by elementary, secondary, and preservice schoolteachers. However, in recent years, different studies have explored its practice among higher education (HE) faculty members. This article presents the first systematic review on LS among HE faculty members. Twenty-one studies published until December 2019 were analyzed. Among others, findings regarding reveal that (a) most of these studies are of U.S. origin and of linguistic and mathematics disciplines; (b) few faculty members participated in these studies; (c) most LS-related references used are not contextualized in HE; (d) beneficial outcomes of LS in the design of the lessons, the participants’ pedagogical knowledge and the participants’ approach to teaching; (e) mixed results regarding the participants’ reflection and collaboration, and (f) less positive outcomes about organizational issues when conducting LS. I discuss these results and present future research lines and limitations of this study.

No abstract

Lesson study (LS) is a process through which teachers design, teach and discuss a lesson collaborating with colleagues. Sometimes, it includes video recording the lesson so teachers can use videos to later discuss the lesson and its improvement, however, there is little research addressing the consequences of doing it. This article investigates participants' perceptions and use of video within LS. Resultsshow that participants perceived video in LS as viable and with potential to stimulate reflection and to improve lessons, but also evince that video affects the outcomes, management and sustainability of LS. We analyze and discuss its potential and the challenges it poses, suggesting ideas for its implementation.

Purpose“Content Representations” (CoRes) is an instrument that links content with aspects about its teaching and is recognized for its utility designing lessons and elucidating teachers' knowledge. Lesson study (LS) is a practice through which teachers collaborate to plan, teach and reflect on a lesson. Both have been acknowledged separately as being valuable for teachers' training; however, there is little research addressing the consequences of combining them. This study filled in that gap by examining how higher education (HE) teachers used the CoRes and perceived its integration within LS.Design/methodology/approachThe authors performed a multiple case study with features of ethnomethodology and conducted an inductive content analysis of the data gathered through document analysis, in-depth semi-structured interviews and participant observation. The research was approved by the ethics committee of the host university, and participants were faculty members from different health sciences disciplines.FindingsThe authors found that participants considered that the use of the CoRes during LS allowed them to organize their ideas, consider more details for lesson design, address new topics and engage in greater reflection. However, participants (specially senior faculty) showed a superficial dedication to filling in the CoRes and considered the instrument bothersome, urging caution when engaging in the combined practice of CoRes and LS.Originality/valueThis is the first research in the international literature approaching the integration of the CoRes and LS with HE teachers. Its results fill a research gap and can help LS practitioners make an informed decision about whether to incorporate CoRes into it.

Uno de los objetivos principales del proyecto From tradition to innovation in Teacher Training Institutions (TO-INN), ha consistido en conocer a los estudiantes de educación a través del análisis de la dimensión social de las instituciones de educación superior. El presente trabajo pretende establecer un debate sobre la presencia de estudiantes indígenas en las universidades, y más concretamente, en los estudios de educación. El proyecto TO-INN parte de una visión sistémica del compromiso social de la Educación Superior con los colectivos tradicionalmente excluidos y especialmente vulnerables, como los pueblos indígenas, que a pesar de haber aumentado el porcentaje de acceso a la universidad convive con desigualdades relacionadas con la inclusión, la permanencia/supervivencia, las condiciones de vida, la participación y los resultados académicos. En este trabajo presentamos: a) una revisión teórica y contextual sobre los pueblos indígenas y su relación con la educación superior; b) el perfil sociodemográfico y académico de los 701 estudiantes de carreras del ámbito educativo pertenecientes a comunidades indígenas o pueblos originarios que participaron en el cuestionario TO-INN sobre la dimensión social (sobre una muestra total de 12.238 participantes); c) la distribución por países de los estudiantes indígenas participantes; d) los datos universitarios de dichos estudiantes; e) su contexto familiar; f) sus condiciones de vida, y g) la participación académica y social de este colectivo. Para finalizar, se presentan las limitaciones del estudio y posibles líneas de investigación futura.