Objective Since the beginning of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, many studies have described the quantitative peripheral blood findings seen in COVID-19 patients. However, morphologic changes have been described by only a few studies. We report morphologic and quantitative changes in peripheral blood of COVID-19 patients. Design We reviewed electronic medical records, complete blood counts, and peripheral blood smears of 20 patients who were COVID-19 positive by reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), from March 1, 2020, through May 31, 2020. The peripheral blood smears of all 20 patients were retrieved and morphological features of white blood cells, red blood cells, and platelets were reviewed and documented. Appropriate pictures were taken. Results Of the 20 patients reviewed, 13 were males and seven were females. The average age of the patients was 65.1 years. The most common quantitative hematologic abnormalities noted on complete blood count (CBC) were anemia followed by neutrophilia, neutrophilic left shift, and lymphopenia. The most significant morphologic changes noted were neutrophils with clumped chromatin, multiple abnormal nuclear shapes, pseudo-Pelger-Huet deformity, and smudged neutrophils. Lymphocytes showed abundant blue cytoplasm and/or lymphoplasmacytoid morphology and monocytes were activated with abnormal shapes and vacuolization. Platelets were adequate in number in the majority of patients and platelet clumping was the most significant finding noted. The red blood cells were normocytic and normochromic with few nucleated red blood cells and coarse basophilic stippling. Conclusion Our study identifies and describes significant morphologic changes in the peripheral blood cells of COVID-19 patients. An understanding of these morphologic changes in addition to established hematologic parameters can aid in the diagnosis of COVID-19 and serial CBC and peripheral smear review may help with management decisions in COVID-19 patients.

No abstract

Coronary no-reflow phenomenon is a lethal mechanism of ongoing myocardial injury, following successful revascularization of an infarct-related coronary artery. Incidence of this phenomenon is high following percutaneous intervention, and is associated with adverse in-hospital and long-term outcomes. Several mechanisms such as ischemia-reperfusion injury and distal microthromboembolism in genetically susceptible patients and those with preexisting endothelial dysfunction have been implicated. However, the exact mechanism in humans is still poorly understood. Several investigative and treatment strategies within and outside the cardiac catheterization laboratory have been proposed, but have not uniformly shown success in reducing mortality or in preventing adverse left ventricular remodeling resulting from this condition. The aim of this article is to provide a brief and concise review of the current understanding of the pathophysiology, clinical predictors, and investigations and management of coronary no-reflow phenomenon.

Background:Intraocular pressure (IOP) is increased during laparoscopic surgery with Trendelenburg position and may contribute to deleterious effects on optic nerve in susceptible patients.Aims:The primary objective of this study is to compare the effects of propofol-based total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) with those of sevoflurane anesthesia on IOP in patients undergoing lower abdominal laparoscopic surgery in Trendelenburg position. Secondary objectives are to compare hemodynamic changes, mean arterial pressure (MAP), end-tidal CO2, and peak inspiratory pressure changes.Materials and Methods:Sixty patients with physical status American Society of Anesthesiologists classes I and II were randomly allocated in two groups: Group A (propofol) and Group B (sevoflurane). IOP along with other parameters was measured at seven points including baseline (T0), 5 min after induction (T1), 5 min after CO2 pneumoperitoneum in supine position (T2), 30 min after CO2 pneumoperitoneum with Trendelenburg position (T3), 5 min after returning to supine position (T4), 5 min after CO2 desufflation (T5), and 5 min after extubation (T6).Results:The change in IOP was different between the two groups. Maximum rise in IOP was seen at T3, and mean ± standard deviation IOP was 15.5 ± 0.9 mmHg and 19.8 ± 1.2 mmHg in Group A and Group B, respectively (P < 0.01). In Group A (propofol), IOP remained almost equal to the baseline value at T3 and the IOP difference was 0.3 ± 0.9 mmHg less than baseline (statistically insignificant, P > 0.05), while in Group B (sevoflurane), IOP increased significantly at T3 and the difference was 4.0 ± 1.2 mmHg (P < 0.001). The IOP was significantly greater (P < 0.01) from T2 to T6 in sevoflurane group than propofol group.Conclusion:Propofol-based TIVA is more effective than inhalational anesthesia with sevoflurane in attenuating the increase in IOP during laparoscopic surgery requiring CO2 pneumoperitoneum with Trendelenburg position.

Utility of EUS-FNA in diagnosing granulomatous lesions of mediastinum in regions with high prevalence of tuberculosis has not yet been evaluated. In the present study, utility and limitations of EUS-FNA of mediastinal lesions from a tertiary care center with high prevalence of tuberculosis were studied. All cases where EUS-FNA had been performed to diagnose mediastinal lymphadenopathy from January 2006 to December 2008 were retrieved from the files of cytopathology laboratory. These were reviewed by the cytopathologist. Two hundred and eighty one EUS-FNA aspirates from 269 patients were evaluated. Satisfactory aspirates were available in 259 cases. A cytological diagnosis of granulomatous lymphadenitis was rendered in 206 cases. Of these, tuberculosis could be established as an etiology in 76 cases and sarcoidosis in 7 cases only. In remaining 123 cases the etiology of granulomatous lymphadenitis could not be established and clinical correlation was suggested. Malignancies were diagnosed or suspected in 24 and 5 cases, respectively. The study highlights that the dilemma of tuberculosis versus sarcoidosis persists in regions with high prevalence of tuberculosis. However, EUS-FNA is useful in diagnosing unsuspected malignancies and confirming the presence of granulomatous lymphadenitis.