Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mendiskusikan faktor-faktor penentu kualitas laba dan konsekuensi ekonomi di pasar modal Indonesia. Faktor-faktor tersebut adalah bawaan, kinerja, risiko perusahaan, dan risiko industri. Kualitas earning diukur menggunakan atribut kualitas akrual, persistensi, prediktabilitas, kelancaran, dan kualitas earning faktorial, sedangkan konsekuensi ekonomi diukur menggunakan varians residual sekuritas. Penelitian ini menggunakan data sekunder berupa laporan keuangan perusahaan mulai tahun 2005 hingga 2010. Penelitian menggunakan tiga langkah pengujian, yaitu (1) pengujian atribut kualitas earning yang berbeda satu sama lain, (2) menganalisis faktor-faktor penentu kualitas earning dan (3) menguji pengaruh kualitas earning di pasar saham dalam konteks hubungan antara informasi asimetris dan kualitas earning. Hasil pengujian pertama menunjukkan bahwa semua dari empat atribut kualitas earning berbeda satu sama lain. Analisis faktor-faktor penentu menunjukkan bahwa variabel leverage memiliki hubungan yang signifikan dengan lima atribut kualitas earning, daripada penjualan dan ukuran perusahaan yang menunjukkan hubungan signifikan dengan empat atribut kualitas informasi earning. Variabel lain seperti siklus operasi, kinerja, dan klasifikasi industri menghasilkan dua atribut kualitas earning. Pengujian konsekuensi ekonomi menghasilkan tiga atribut kualitas laba yang memiliki hubungan signifikan dengan varians residual sekuritas yaitu atribut kualitas akrual, kelancaran, dan kualitas laba faktorial.

We try to explain the role of enterprise risk management as a moderation in increasing firm value (empirical study on manufacturing companies that have been listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX) for the period of 2016-2018. in this study are manufacturing companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange (BEI) during the period 2016 to 2018. Samples using the purposive sampling method, there are 14 companies as samples.The analytical tool used is multiple linear regression analysis with Moderated Regression Analysis (MRA) which aims to analyze the influence of corporate social responsibility (CSR), managerial ownership, independent commissioners and audit committees on firm value with enterprise risk management as a moderating variable using SPSS v.22 software The results of the study show evidence that: (1) Corporate social responsibility sponsibility has a positive and significant effect on firm value. (2) Managerial ownership has a positive and significant effect on firm value. (3) Independent commissioners have a positive and significant effect on company value. (4) The audit committee has a positive and significant effect on the value of the company. (5) Enterprise risk management is able to moderate the influence of corporate social responsibility on corporate value. (6) Enterprise risk management is able to moderate the influence of managerial ownership on firm value. (7) Enterprise risk management is able to moderate the influence of independent commissioners on company value. (8) Enterprise risk management is able to moderate the influence of the audit committee on the company's value.

The research aimed to discuss the determinant factors of earnings quality and the economic consequences in Indonesian capital market. Those factors are innate, performance, company risk and industry risk. The quality of earnings was measured using attributes are accrual quality, persistence, predictability, smoothness, and the quality of factorial earnings, whereas the economic consequence was measured using security residual variance. The research employed the secondary data in the form of financial statement of the companies starting from 2005 until 2010. The research employed three steps of testing, namely (1) testing of the attributes of earnings quality were different from each other, (2) analyzing the determining factors of earnings quality and (3) testing the effect of earnings quality in the stock market in terms of the relationship between information asymmetric and the earnings quality. The result of the first testing showed that all of the four attributes of earnings quality were different from each other. The analysis of determinant factors showed that leverage variable had a significant relationship with five attributes of earnings quality, than sales and firm size showed significant relationship with four attributes of earnings information quality. The other variables such as operation cycle, performance and the classification of the industry resulted in two attributes of earnings quality. The economic consequence testing resulted in three attributes of earnings quality that had a significant relationship with the security residual variance. Those attributes were accrual quality, smoothness, and factorial earnings quality.

The aims of this study are to determine and analyze the effect of (1) Self efficacy on audit judgment, (2) Time budget pressure on audit judgment, (3) Audit experience on audit judgment, (4) Task complexity moderates the effect of self efficacy on audit judgment, (5) Task complexity moderates the effect of time budget pressure on audit judgment, (6) Task complexity moderates the effect of audit experience on audit judgment. This research is a type of quantitative research. In this study using attribution theory and social cognitive theory. The population in this study are the auditors in the inspectorate of West Sulawesi Province. The sample determination in this study used census method. The data consisted of primary data obtained using questionnaire and secondary data. The results showed that self efficacy, time budget pressure and audit experience had a positive and significant effect on audit judgment. Task complexity does not moderate the correlation between self efficacy on audit judgment. Task complexity moderates the correlation between time budget pressure on audit judgment. Task complexity moderates the correlation between audit experience on audit judgment. Keywords: Audit judgment, Self efficacy, Time budget pressure, Audit experience, Task complexity.

This literature study aims to build and construct conception more strongly based on empirical studies that have been conducted so that it can describe how the effects of budgeting participation in improving managerial performance. In this study the author uses a literature study approach based on empirical studies or studies in several international journals relating to budgetary participation with performance. The review of this article can be concluded that budgetary participation can provide a positive role in managerial performance. But budget participation is not the only factor that can improve managerial performance but budget participation can be moderated or mediated with other variables such as psychological capital, Job relevant Information, knowledge and competencies, leadership style, motivation, and others.