No abstract

In this article we discuss two cases that highlight possible complications of cardiac device implantation. In particular, our first case involves a patient who, during implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) implantation, sustained injuries to her subclavian artery and vein and subsequently developed a self-resolving neuropraxia of the brachial plexus. In our second case, the patient, also during ICD implantation, had his left cephalic vein nicked during cutdown. Post-op he then developed a hematoma-induced left brachial plexus injury that also eventually self-resolved. A literature search has not shown other incidences of iatrogenic brachial plexus injuries from ICD implantation as described.

No abstract

Objective The commercially available C-Port distal anastomotic device (Food and Drug Administration cleared in 2007) is an automated miniature vascular stapler that performs the coronary anastomosis. This prospective multicenter registry sought to evaluate midterm patency using this device compared with hand-sewn grafts. Methods Patients receiving at least one C-Port anastomosis during coronary artery bypass grafting surgery were enrolled at eight sites. Of the 117 patients enrolled, 78 patients (67%) with 104 C-Port vein grafts completed the study to patency assessment via computed tomography angiography. Clinical follow-up and index graft patency (Gated 64-slice computed tomography scan) were performed at least 12 months postoperatively. The primary efficacy endpoint was patency compared with the peer-reviewed results from the PRoject of Ex-vivo Vein graft ENgineering via Transfection IV (PREVENT IV) trial. Results The patient population was consistent with the PREVENT IV placebo cohort. The mortality at 12 months was 0.85% (1/117). The major cardiac morbidity rate was 3.4% (4/117). The C-Port vein graft occlusion rate was 16.3% (17/104) compared with 26.6% (597/2242) in the PREVENT IV trial ( P = 0.011). Within this study, C-Port graft occlusion rates were not significantly different from the hand-sewn grafts ( P = 0.821). Conclusions The C-Port device is safe and effective in creating the distal anastomosis with equivalent patency rates to hand-sewn grafts at 12 months. When compared with hand-sewn anastomoses from a recent large prospective trial, the C-Port device demonstrated a statistically significant reduction in midterm graft occlusion. Further studies are required to evaluate its effect in less invasive coronary surgery.

We present a case where defibrillation threshold was dangerously elevated to the point that the patient had no safety margin, and his implantable cardioverter-defibrillator generator was discovered to have migrated. Generator migration reduces the distance between the can and the coil, effectively creating a smaller bipolar current and sparing the left ventricle from the current needed for defibrillation. This case underscores the importance of securing the generator in place, as this patient would have been spared multiple shocks and an invasive medical procedure had his generator been better secured. Core tip: Defibrillation threshold can be altered by a myriad of factors including generator migration. We report a case to illustrate the concept of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator defibrillation vectors and its effect on defibrillation threshold.