A series of 514 patients seen at three clinics in the United States and Spain were evaluated using clinical Judgments of hypernasality, and nasometric assessment of oral-nasal resonance balance. Data from the nasometer were obtained while patients read a passage devoid of nasal consonants. Across all subjects, the Pearson correlation coefficient between the clinical and instrumental measures was 0.78. Prediction analyses revealed that maximum efficiency was obtained using a somewhat different threshold nasalance value for each of the three patient samples. When all 514 subjects were investigated as a single group, a threshold nasalance score of 28 was found to optimize identification of patients with and without clinically significant hypernasality. In that analysis, a sensitivity of 0.87, a specificity of 0.86 and an overall efficiency of 0.87 was obtained. The clinical relevance of these findings is discussed.

Data are discussed relative to the events surrounding team management of clefts, including surgery, middle-ear problems, and feeding difficulty.

This study examined the relationship between nasalance scores as derived from the Model 6200 Nasometer and listener judgments of perceived nasality for individuals with pharyngeal flaps. Sixteen Individuals with pharyngeal flaps read a speech sample consisting of seven sentences for which associated nasalance scores were obtained. In addition, 10 trained listeners were asked to judge the subjects' audiorecorded speech samples for the degree of both hypernasality and hyponasality using two 6-point scales. The mean judges' ratings of hypernasality did not increase systematically with increasing nasalance scores or with decreasing hyponasality ratings. However, as the nasalance scores associated with nasal loaded sentences increased, a systematic decrease in listener perception of hyponasality occurred.

This study examined the relationship between nasalance scores as derived from the Model 6200 Nasometer and listener judgments of perceived nasality for individuals with pharyngeal flaps. Sixteen individuals with pharyngeal flaps read a speech sample consisting of seven sentences for which associated nasalance scores were obtained. In addition, 10 trained listeners were asked to judge the subjects' audiorecorded speech samples for the degree of both hypernasality and hyponasality using two 6-point scales. The mean judges' ratings of hypernasality did not increase systematically with increasing nasalance scores or with decreasing hyponasality ratings. However, as the nasalance scores associated with nasal loaded sentences increased, a systematic decrease in listener perception of hyponasality occurred.