The involvement of a notary in a criminal case is caused by the negligence and carelessness of the notary. Such as the criminal act of falsifying the deed he made intentionally. As in several cases examined in this study. The type of research used in this research is normative juridical. The research approach used is a statutory approach, an analytical approach and a case approach. The results of the research obtained are the legal consequences of a Notary deed containing elements of forgery does not automatically result in the deed being null and void, because the aggrieved parties must file a civil lawsuit to the court to cancel the deed. If a court decision has permanent legal force, then the deed can be annulled. Notaries cannot be held criminally responsible for deed falsification if it is not proven that there was an intentional factor, because the Notary only records what was submitted by the parties to be included in the deed. False information submitted by the parties is the responsibility of the parties. However, if it is proven that there is an element of intent, the notary can be held criminally responsible.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.