The delivery of peer and self-management support using m-health technologies is well received and may improve self-management and social support. More research is needed to test hypotheses of the effect of the Healing Circles program on clinical outcomes.

BackgroundTens of thousands of cardiac and vascular surgeries (CaVS) are performed on seniors in Canada and the United Kingdom each year to improve survival, relieve disease symptoms, and improve health-related quality of life (HRQL). However, chronic postsurgical pain (CPSP), undetected or delayed detection of hemodynamic compromise, complications, and related poor functional status are major problems for substantial numbers of patients during the recovery process. To tackle this problem, we aim to refine and test the effectiveness of an eHealth-enabled service delivery intervention, TecHnology-Enabled remote monitoring and Self-MAnagemenT—VIsion for patient EmpoWerment following Cardiac and VasculaR surgery (THE SMArTVIEW, CoVeRed), which combines remote monitoring, education, and self-management training to optimize recovery outcomes and experience of seniors undergoing CaVS in Canada and the United Kingdom.ObjectiveOur objectives are to (1) refine SMArTVIEW via high-fidelity user testing and (2) examine the effectiveness of SMArTVIEW via a randomized controlled trial (RCT).MethodsCaVS patients and clinicians will engage in two cycles of focus groups and usability testing at each site; feedback will be elicited about expectations and experience of SMArTVIEW, in context. The data will be used to refine the SMArTVIEW eHealth delivery program. Upon transfer to the surgical ward (ie, post-intensive care unit [ICU]), 256 CaVS patients will be reassessed postoperatively and randomly allocated via an interactive Web randomization system to the intervention group or usual care. The SMArTVIEW intervention will run from surgical ward day 2 until 8 weeks following surgery. Outcome assessments will occur on postoperative day 30; at week 8; and at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months. The primary outcome is worst postop pain intensity upon movement in the previous 24 hours (Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form), averaged across the previous 14 days. Secondary outcomes include a composite of postoperative complications related to hemodynamic compromise—death, myocardial infarction, and nonfatal stroke— all-cause mortality and surgical site infections, functional status (Medical Outcomes Study Short Form-12), depressive symptoms (Geriatric Depression Scale), health service utilization-related costs (health service utilization data from the Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences data repository), and patient-level cost of recovery (Ambulatory Home Care Record). A linear mixed model will be used to assess the effects of the intervention on the primary outcome, with an a priori contrast of weekly average worst pain intensity upon movement to evaluate the primary endpoint of pain at 8 weeks postoperation. We will also examine the incremental cost of the intervention compared to usual care using a regression model to estimate the difference in expected health care costs between groups.ResultsStudy start-up is underway and usability testing is scheduled to begin in the fall of 2016.ConclusionsGiven our experience, dedicated industry partners, an...

Women with heart disease, stroke, and vascular cognitive impairment (VCI) experience gender inequities across the health care continuum. The Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada conducted needs assessment to inform its approach in addressing health inequities experienced by women with heart disease, stroke, and VCI across the continuum of care. Although specific input is confidential, this article outlines the engagement methods used and the evaluation results. The 3-stage engagement process consisted of an internal content review, 18 in-person discussion groups via a cross-Canada tour, 14 expert interviews, and a collaboration session. In total, 204 and 57 participants were recruited for the cross-Canada tour and collaboration session, respectively. Using the Public and Patient Engagement Evaluation Tool, participants scored the engagement processes positively and found participation to be a valuable use of their time. This undertaking highlighted aspects to consider when engaging people with lived experience and how engagement can support the recovery journey. Insights presented throughout this article can help inform future research that seeks to engage stakeholders at a national level.

Actively engaging people with lived experience (PWLE) in stroke-related clinical practice guideline development has not been effectively implemented. This pilot project evaluated the feasibility, perceived value, and effectiveness of the Community Consultation and Review Panel (CCRP), a new model to engage PWLE in the writing and review of Canadian Stroke Best Practice Recommendations. Responses to a standardized evaluation tool indicated that participants perceived the CCRP as valued, impactful, effective, and beneficial to stroke care. This project successfully demonstrated that values, experiences, and recommendations of PWLE can be effectively incorporated into guideline content and is applicable to all guideline development processes.

Background Actively engaging people with lived experience (PWLE) in stroke-related clinical practice guideline development has not previously been implemented and evaluated despite international efforts to incorporate patient and public engagement. The purpose of this pilot project was to evaluate the feasibility, perceived value and effectiveness of a new model, the Community Consultation and Review Panel, to actively engage PWLE in the writing and review of Canadian Stroke Best Practice Recommendations (CSBPR).Methods Members of the public with lived experience relevant to CSBPR module topics, including people with stroke, family members and caregivers, were recruited to participate in two CSBPR Community Consultation and Review Panels (CCRP). The CCRP ran in parallel to scientific writing groups updating two components of the CSBPR Rehabilitation, Recovery and Community Participation module – Rehabilitation and Recovery following Stroke and Transitions and Community Participation following Stroke . With the aid of an inter-group liaison, both the scientific writing group and CCRP reviewed the updated evidence and CCRP participants added insights and context based on their personal experiences. We utilized the Patient and Public Engagement Evaluation Tool (PPEET) to obtain CCRP participant feedback.Results This model was found to be feasible, requiring 3-4 hours of staff time per week. CCRP participants rated “strongly agree” or “agree” to 14 PPEET questions indicating that they perceived the CCRP to be a positive experience and effective process, and their participation had an impact. Responses to the open-ended questions revealed that CCRP participants felt that their input and recommendations on the CCSPR were acknowledged and would benefit stroke care in Canada.Conclusions The overall success of this pilot project established the feasibility and perceived benefit of employing a participatory and collaborative model to actively engage PWLE in stroke-related clinical practice guideline development. The values, experiences and recommendations of PWLE were able to be effectively incorporated into CSBPR content to enable lived experience specific context and considerations to augment the existing scientifically rigorous writing and review process. This model is now the standard practice for all future CSBPR module development and updates and could be adapted for guideline development across other disciplines.