The clinical results with pedobarographic analysis were assessed in 32 patients (59 metatarsals) who underwent a distal metatarsal shortening (Weil) osteotomy for either intractable plantar keratoses or chronically dislocated lesser metatarsal phalangeal joints. All patients had increased pressure under the involved metatarsal heads. Thirty three of the 59 metatarsophalangeal (MTP) joints were chronically dislocated. At an average follow-up of 30 months, patients rated the result as excellent or good for 32 of the 37 feet (86%). The mean preoperative AOFAS score was 59 (maximum 100), which improved to 81 post-operatively. This difference is significant: p = 0.00001 (with t-test). Comparison of the pre and post-operative pedobarographic measurements showed a significant decreased load under the affected metatarsal heads (p = 0.05). A complete disappearance of the callus was noted under 44 operated metatarsals (75%) and partial disappearance under 12 metatarsals (20%). Two symptomatic transfer lesions occurred under an adjacent metatarsal head. Recurrent dislocations occurred in 5 joints (15%). While metatarsophalangeal joint range of motion was significantly diminished, toe strength was maintained. Average metatarsal shortening was 5.9 mm with no nonunions, delayed unions, or malunions. The Weil shortening osteotomy is a simple and reliable procedure which can effectively reduce the load under the lesser metatarsophalangeal joints and is helpful for the reduction of dorsally dislocated MTP joints.
This study shows a good and reliable correlation between the [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text]. However, the [Formula: see text] overcomes the shortcomings of inaccuracy and provides valuable spatial data that could be incorporated during computer-assisted surgery to assess the multiplanar correction of a hindfoot deformity.
The aim of this study was to compare the subjective, clinical and pedodynographic results of two large groups of patients operated on in our department. From January 1987 to December 1992, 38 rheumatoid patients (59 feet) underwent a Keller-Lelièvre arthroplasty of the first metatarsophalangeal (MTP1) joint and a Hoffmann resection of the lesser metatarsal heads. The mean follow-up was 35 months. From June 1992 to August 1997 48 patients (62 feet) with rheumatoid arthritis underwent an arthrodesis of the MTP1 joint and Hoffmann resection of the lesser metatarsal heads. The mean follow-up was 25 months. In 10 feet the arthrodesis was performed as a revision procedure of a failed Keller-Lelièvre arthroplasty. The patients of both series were assessed in the same way: personal interview, clinical examination, radiographs, bilateral footprints, and pedodynographic measurements. Static and dynamic pedodynographic measurements were taken with a 64-sensor matrix insole in a standard shoe. Six of our patients had an arthrodesis-Hoffmann procedure performed on one foot and a Keller-Lelièvre-Hoffmann procedure on the contralateral side. Although there is better loadbearing of the first ray with relative unloading of the central metatarsal heads in the arthrodesis MTP1-Hoffmann group, subjective evaluation of the procedure was slightly better in the Keller-Lelièvre-Hoffmann group. Ninety-three percent of the patients in the Keller group were satisfied or satisfied with minor reservations versus 87 percent in the arthrodesis group. This difference is not statistically significant. Recurrent deformity was not more prominent in the Keller-Lelièvre-Hoffmann group; however, it may be that with a longer follow-up, the feet in the arthrodesis-Hoffmann group hold up better over time. The arthrodesis MTP1-Hoffmann procedure can be used as a revision procedure for a failed Keller- Hoffmann operation, although these procedures were more difficult and needed a longer recovery time than the primary MTP1 arthrodesis.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.