Twenty-eight patients, with severe, acute Lisfranc dislocations, requiring operative intervention, were treated between 1989 and 1992 in a level one Trauma Center. Different treatment protocols were used by the two senior staff surgeons. This allowed ORIF to be compared to complete arthrodesis and partial arthrodesis. Twelve patients were treated with primary arthrodesis after open reduction of the dislocation. Partial (5) or complete arthrodesis (6) (depending on the type of fracture) was performed in these 12 patients. Sixteen patients were treated with open reduction and temporary fixation with stabilization and compression screw fixation (ORIF group). The subgroups were identical in age (mean 30.5 years), follow-up (30.1 months), type of fracture, type of injury and time to intervention. Anatomical reduction was achieved in eight of the 12 patients in the arthrodesis groups and in 12 of the 16 patients in the ORIF group. The Baltimore Painful foot Score (PFS) was higher in the ORIF group then in the complete arthrodesis group meaning the ORIF group had less pain. No difference in the PFS was found between the ORIF group and the partial arthrodesis group. Subsequent revision surgery was necessary in two cases in the arthrodesis groups and two cases in the ORIF group. Stiffness of the forefoot, loss of metatarsal arch, and sympathetic dystrophy occurred more frequently in the complete arthrodesis group. Open reduction and internal fixation with screws or partial arthrodesis is the treatment of choice in severe tarsometatarsal fracture dislocations. Primary complete arthrodesis should be reserved as a salvage procedure.
From 1987 to 1993, 20 athletes (22 feet) underwent cheilectomy for Regnauld grade I, grade II hallux rigidus. Average age was 31 years (10 men and 12 women); mean follow-up was at 5.1 years. All patients performed high-level sports (judo, track & field, soccer, and skating). Indications for surgery included failure of nonsurgical treatment with persistent pain during sports activities, shoefitting problems, and recurrent bursitis. The aim of our study was to evaluate the results clinically, radiographically, and objectively, using dynamic and static pedodynographic measurements. After a mean follow-up of 5 years, cheilectomy was demonstrated to be a reliable treatment method in athletes with Regnauld grades 1 and 2 hallux rigidus. Functionally, 14 excellent, seven good, and one fair result were noted. Radiological progression was noted in 7 of 13 patients, with a follow-up of >4 years. Postoperative dynamic pedodynographic findings demonstrated moderate but significant changes in peak pressures under the first metatarsal head, the hallux, and in the center of pressure distribution under the forefoot.
Harvesting of the FHL tendon when transection is made distal to the knot of Henry may cause injuries to the medial and lateral plantar nerves. Experience in this procedure may reduce the risk of nerve injuries but even then nerve lesions remain possible. The clinical significance of these nerve lesions is not described in literature and remains to be determined.
The aim of this study was to compare the subjective, clinical and pedodynographic results of two large groups of patients operated on in our department. From January 1987 to December 1992, 38 rheumatoid patients (59 feet) underwent a Keller-Lelièvre arthroplasty of the first metatarsophalangeal (MTP1) joint and a Hoffmann resection of the lesser metatarsal heads. The mean follow-up was 35 months. From June 1992 to August 1997 48 patients (62 feet) with rheumatoid arthritis underwent an arthrodesis of the MTP1 joint and Hoffmann resection of the lesser metatarsal heads. The mean follow-up was 25 months. In 10 feet the arthrodesis was performed as a revision procedure of a failed Keller-Lelièvre arthroplasty. The patients of both series were assessed in the same way: personal interview, clinical examination, radiographs, bilateral footprints, and pedodynographic measurements. Static and dynamic pedodynographic measurements were taken with a 64-sensor matrix insole in a standard shoe. Six of our patients had an arthrodesis-Hoffmann procedure performed on one foot and a Keller-Lelièvre-Hoffmann procedure on the contralateral side. Although there is better loadbearing of the first ray with relative unloading of the central metatarsal heads in the arthrodesis MTP1-Hoffmann group, subjective evaluation of the procedure was slightly better in the Keller-Lelièvre-Hoffmann group. Ninety-three percent of the patients in the Keller group were satisfied or satisfied with minor reservations versus 87 percent in the arthrodesis group. This difference is not statistically significant. Recurrent deformity was not more prominent in the Keller-Lelièvre-Hoffmann group; however, it may be that with a longer follow-up, the feet in the arthrodesis-Hoffmann group hold up better over time. The arthrodesis MTP1-Hoffmann procedure can be used as a revision procedure for a failed Keller- Hoffmann operation, although these procedures were more difficult and needed a longer recovery time than the primary MTP1 arthrodesis.
The split posterior tibial tendon transfer procedure was first reported by Green for correction of equinovarus hindfoot deformity in patients with cerebral palsy. A modification of the split posterior tibial tendon transfer combined with an Achilles tendon lengthening is described in 17 children (21 procedures) with a minimum follow-up of 3 years. This modified technique is indicated in young children with a continuously spastic posterior tibial tendon to correct a dynamic equinovarus. It restores active dorsiflexion when the anterior tibial and extensor muscles are weak. The anterior half of the split tibialis posterior is transferred through the interosseus membrane to the dorsum of the foot. Excellent or good results and two poor results were noted after a mean follow-up of 29 months. In the patients with an excellent or good result, marked improvement of their equinovarus foot deformity in stance and swing phase of gait was seen. In two patients, the procedure failed because of technical errors.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.