An emergent debate surrounds the nature of language processing in bilingual children as an extension of broader questions about their morphosyntactic development in comparison to monolinguals, with the picture so far being nuanced. This paper adds to this debate by investigating the processing of morphosyntactically complex which–questions (e.g., Which bear is chasing the camel?) using the visual world paradigm and is the first study to examine the online processing of such questions in bilingual children. For both groups, object which-questions were more difficult than subject which-questions, due to an initial misinterpretation that needed to be reanalysed. Both groups were aided by number mismatch between the two nouns in the sentence, especially in object which-questions. Our findings are in line with previous studies that have shown a slower processing speed in bilingual children relative to monolinguals but qualitatively similar patterns.
Syntactic Priming in Language Acquisition, edited by Katherine Messenger, is a thorough and insightful overview of how a widely used experimental paradigm has been adopted and adapted in child acquisition research. Its wide scope includes typically developing monolingual children, bilingual children and children with language and communication difficulties.From the onset, Messenger explicitly focuses on syntactic priming as an experimental paradigm and seeks to differentiate it from earlier work with children, which involved modelling and imitation of verbal behaviour. She also draws a distinction between structural and syntactic priming and focuses on the latter. This is considered a more specific and experimentally controlled paradigm of priming involving the repetition of sentences with a specific syntactic structure (e.g. passives) as opposed to other more implicit forms of structural priming. Beyond the introductory chapter, the book is divided into two broad sections; the first one examines how syntactic priming has been used with typically developing children, while the second one reviews its use with bilingual children or children with atypical language development. Two main themes permeate the majority of the volume's contributions; first, based on research so far, priming is viewed as an example of implicit learning; second, priming is presented as a means of furthering our knowledge and understanding in the field of language acquisition. Proposals to this end include diversifying the languages and linguistic features tested, enhancing the ecological validity of studies and conducting more work that explores individual differences as mediators of priming effects.Chapters 2 to 5 make up the first section on priming used in the context of typically developing monolingual children. In Chapter 2, Contemori provides an introductory overview of the paradigm and outlines its value in establishing that young children have abstract syntactic representations. Contemori introduces the uncontroversial notion that syntactic priming reflects a form of learning and evaluates how lexical overlap between prime and target impacts priming effects. Skipping to Chapter 4, Messenger provides a comprehensive summary of various theoretical models and evaluates their predictions.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.