THE CATEGORY OF " FRAMEWORK " RESPONSES IN THE SYSTEMS OFTHEORETICAL PSYCHOLOGY E XPLANATION of many of the " higher " mental processes has insistently demanded the postulation of some controlling pattern such as apperceptive mass, Einstellung, determining tendency, delusional system, postural adjustment, sensory orientation, value hierarchy, means-ends readinesses, personality radix, master attitude, etc. Recent discussions in education, politics, philosophy, and the " sociology of knowledge " have independently developed the notions of a frame of reference, pyramid of goods, ideology, or world-model as dominating individual or group interpretation of experiences. Recent field, clinical, and laboratory studies suggest that a fruitful union of these two academic traditions in the inclusive concept of " framework reactions" results in a better understanding of many features of adult behavior, particularly the obscurer phenomena of social psychology.The chief concrete manifestation of a framework is a guiding pattern of belief and action conveyed by such terms as " theist," " economic radical," " thoroughgoing democrat," etc. Its psychological reality is attested by the evidence of factorial analyses, consistency in individual conduct, homogeneity of opinion within segregated groups, and the internal logic of any system of thought. Persons with an X organization, so to speak, find it difficult or impossible to comprehend those of Y organization. Studies of learning guided by this outlook may indicate that x responses are readily acquired by persons with a preexisting X pattern; y responses, however, will not be easily made