An algorithm for the rapid analytical determination of the accessible surface areas of solute molecules is described. The accessible surface areas as well as the derivatives with respect to the Cartesian coordinates of the atoms are computed by a program called "MSEED," which is based in part on Connolly's analytical formulas for determining surface area. Comparisons of the CPU time required for MSEED, Connolly's numerical algorithm DOT, and a program for surface area determination (ANA) based on Connolly's analytical algorithm, are presented. MSEED is shown to be as much as 70 times faster than ANA and up to 11 times faster than DOT for several proteins. The greater speed of MSEED is achieved partially because nonproductive computation of the surface areas of internal atoms is avoided. A sample minimization of an energy function, which included a term for hydration, was carried out on MET-enkephalin using MSEED to compute the solvent-accessible surface area and its derivatives. The potential employed was ECEPPiZ plus an empirical potential for solvation based on the solvent-accessible surface area of the peptide. The CPU time required for 150 steps of minimization with the potential that included solvation was approximately twice as great as the CPU time required for 150 steps of minimization with the ECEPP/2 potential only.
Continuum solvation models that estimate free energies of solvation as a function of solvent accessible surface area are computationally simple enough to be useful for predicting protein conformation. The behavior of three such solvation models has been examined by applying them to the minimization of the conformational energy of bovine pancreatic trypsin inhibitor. The models differ only with regard to how the constants of proportionality between free energy and surface area were derived. Each model was derived by fitting to experimentally measured equilibrium solution properties. For two models, the solution property was free energy of hydration. For the third, the property was NMR coupling constants. The purpose of this study is to determine the effect of applying these solvation models to the nonequilibrium conformations of a protein arising in the course of global searches for conformational energy minima. Two approaches were used: (1) local energy minimization of an ensemble of conformations similar to the equilibrium conformation and (2) global search trajectories using Monte Carlo plus minimization starting from a single conformation similar to the equilibrium conformation. For the two models derived from free energy measurements, it was found that both the global searches and local minimizations yielded conformations more similar to the X-ray crystallographic structures than did searches or local minimizations carried out in the absence of a solvation component of the conformational energy. The model derived from NMR coupling constants behaved similarly to the other models in the context of a global search trajectory. For one of the models derived from measured free energies of hydration, it was found that minimization of an ensemble of near-equilibrium conformations yielded a new ensemble in which the conformation most similar to the X-ray determined structure PTI4 had the lowest total free energy. Despite the simplicity of the continuum solvation models, the final conformation generated in the trajectories for each of the models exhibited some of the characteristics that have been reported for conformations obtained from molecular dynamics simulations in the presence of a bath of explicit water molecules. They have smaller root mean square (rms) deviations from the experimentally determined conformation, fewer incorrect hydrogen bonds, and slightly larger radii of gyration than do conformations derived from search trajectories carried out in the absence of solvent.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.