Whereas perceptions of malocclusion by the public are mainly subjective, currently orthodontic treatment needs are predominantly determined using normative need. There are considerable differences between normative and subjective perceptions of orthodontic need. Yet clinical measures determine current provision of orthodontic services, whereas subjective oral health‐related quality of life (OHRQoL) measures are seldom used and play a small part in need assessment despite predicting perceived need. The sociodental approach to assessing orthodontic treatment needs overcomes deficiencies of the sole use of normative need. It is a gradual integration process, estimating orthodontic needs by combining normative and psychosocial perspectives, as well as considering behavioral factors affecting outcomes of orthodontic treatment and scientific evidence about the effectiveness of interventions. To be appropriately used in needs assessment, an OHRQoL measure should provide condition‐specific estimates of the impact of malocclusion on daily life. The sociodental approach attempts to replicate the characteristics of good clinical practice using a structured, rational, and coherent system for assessing orthodontic needs and, therefore, is a useful tool in planning oral health services.

Social participation prevents social isolation and loneliness among older adults while having numerous positive effects on their health and well-being in rapidly aging societies. We aimed to estimate the effect of retaining more natural teeth on social participation among older adults in Japan. The analysis used longitudinal data from 24,872 participants in the Japan Gerontological Evaluation Study (2010, 2013, and 2016). We employed a longitudinal modified treatment policy approach to determine the effect of several hypothetical scenarios (preventive scenarios and tooth loss scenarios) on frequent social participation (1 = at least once a week/0 = less than once a week) after a 6-y follow-up. The corresponding statistical parameters were estimated using targeted minimum loss-based estimation (TMLE) method. Number of teeth category (edentate/1–9/10–19/≥20) was treated as a time-varying exposure, and the outcome estimates were adjusted for time-varying (income, self-rated health, marital status, instrumental activities of daily living, vision loss, hearing loss, major comorbidities, and number of household members) and time-invariant covariates (age, sex, education, baseline social participation). Less frequent social participation was associated with older age, male sex, lower income, low educational attainment, and poor self-rated health at the baseline. Social participation improved when tooth loss prevention scenarios were emulated. The best preventive scenario (i.e., maintaining ≥20 teeth among each participant) improved social participation by 8% (risk ratio [RR] = 1.08; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.05–1.11). Emulated tooth loss scenarios gradually decreased social participation. A hypothetical scenario in which all the participants were edentate throughout the follow-up period resulted in a 11% (RR = 0.89; 95% CI, 0.84–0.94) reduction in social participation. Subsequent tooth loss scenarios showed 8% (RR = 0.92; 95% CI, 0.88–0.95), 6% (RR = 0.94; 95% CI, 0.91–0.97), and 4% (RR = 0.96; 95% CI, 0.93–0.98) reductions, respectively. Thus, among Japanese older adults, retaining a higher number of teeth positively affects their social participation, whereas being edentate or having a relatively lower number of teeth negatively affects their social participation.

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract