The objective of this study was to characterize the effects of multiple nasal prong interface configurations on nasal depositional loss of pharmaceutical aerosols in a preterm infant nose-throat (NT) airway model. Benchmark in vitro experiments were performed in which a spray-dried powder formulation was delivered to a new preterm NT model with a positive-pressure infant air-jet dry powder inhaler using single- and dual-prong interfaces. These results were used to develop and validate a computational fluid dynamics (CFD) model of aerosol transport and deposition in the NT geometry. The validated CFD model was then used to explore the NT depositional characteristic of multiple prong types and configurations. The CFD model highlighted a turbulent jet effect emanating from the prong(s). Analysis of NT aerosol deposition efficiency curves for a characteristic particle size and delivery flowrate (3 µm and 1.4 L/min (LPM)) revealed little difference in NT aerosol deposition fraction (DF) across the prong insertion depths of 2–5 mm (DF = 16–24%) with the exception of a single prong with 5-mm insertion (DF = 36%). Dual prongs provided a modest reduction in deposition vs. a single aerosol delivery prong at the same flow for insertion depths < 5 mm. The presence of the prongs increased nasal depositional loss by absolute differences in the range of 20–70% compared with existing correlations for ambient aerosols. In conclusion, the use of nasal prongs was shown to have a significant impact on infant NT aerosol depositional loss prompting the need for prong design alterations to improve lung delivery efficiency. Graphical Abstract

Nasal sprays, which produce relatively large pharmaceutical droplets and have high momentum, are primarily used to deliver locally acting drugs to the nasal mucosa. Depending on spray pump administration conditions and insertion angles, nasal sprays may interact with the nasal surface in ways that creates complex droplet–wall interactions followed by significant liquid motion after initial wall contact. Additionally, liquid motion can occur after deposition as the spray liquid moves in bulk along the nasal surface. It is difficult or impossible to capture these conditions with commonly used computational fluid dynamics (CFD) models of spray droplet transport that typically employ a deposit-on-touch boundary condition. Hence, an updated CFD framework with a new spray–wall interaction (SWI) model in tandem with a post-deposition liquid motion (PDLM) model was developed and applied to evaluate nasal spray delivery for Flonase and Flonase Sensimist products. For both nasal spray products, CFD revealed significant effects of the spray momentum on surface liquid motion, as well as motion of the surface film due to airflow generated shear stress and gravity. With Flonase, these factors substantially influenced the final resting place of the liquid. For Flonase Sensimist, anterior and posterior liquid movements were approximately balanced over time. As a result, comparisons with concurrent in vitro experimental results were substantially improved for Flonase compared with the traditional deposit-on-touch boundary condition. The new SWI-PDLM model highlights the dynamicenvironment that occurs when a nasal spray interacts with a nasal wall surface and can be used to better understand the delivery of current nasal spray products as well as to develop new nasal drug delivery strategies with improved regional targeting.

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract