An early intervention, offered to patients with an estimated high risk for persisting disability, had no additional effect on symptom level at 3 months after MTBI as compared to TAU.
Patients who report few symptoms early after mild traumatic brain injury are likely to have a good outcome regarding activity and participation. The intervention offered in this study, focusing on reassurance of a good outcome and treatment of comorbidities, had no effect.
ObjectivesTo assess (1) whether visual disturbances can be demonstrated with objective measures more often in patients with mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) than in orthopaedic controls and non-injured controls, (2) whether such objectively demonstrated disturbances change over time and (3) whether self-reported visual symptoms after mTBI correlate with objectively measurable changes in visuomotor performance.DesignA prospective, controlled, observational study, with assessments planned 7–10 and 75–100 days after injury.SettingEmergency department of a general hospital in Sweden.Participants15 patients with mTBI, 15 patients with minor orthopaedic injury, 15 non-injured controls, aged 18–40 years.Outcome measuresVisual examination, including assessment of visual acuity, accommodation, eye alignment, saccades and stereoacuity. Symptom assessment using Convergence Insufficiency Symptoms Survey (CISS) and Rivermead PostConcussion Symptoms Questionnaire.ResultsAssessments were performed 4–13 and 81–322 days after injury (extended time frames for logistical reasons). No statistically significant difference was found between the mTBI and control groups regarding saccade performance and stereoacuity at any time point. The accommodative amplitude was significantly lower in the mTBI group compared with non-injured controls at baseline. 6 out of 13 patients with mTBI had accommodative insufficiency at follow-up. Near point of convergence in the mTBI group was receded at baseline and improved statistically significantly at follow-up. At baseline, patients with mTBI had significantly higher CISS score than orthopaedic and non-injured controls. For patients with mTBI, the CISS score correlated with fusional vergence.ConclusionThere were some transient measurable visual changes regarding convergence in patients with mTBI during the subacute period after the injury. Our findings of persistence of accommodative insufficiency in a considerable proportion of patients with mTBI suggest that this visual function should not be overlooked in clinical assessment.
SUMMARYIL-13 is produced by T cells and, like IL-4, it can induce the production of IgE and IgG4. In order to investigate if IL-13 is a specific marker for atopic dermatitis (AD), IL-13 gene expression was analysed in chronic lichenified lesions and non-lesional skin of patients with AD, in involved and non-involved skin of patients with psoriasis, in positive tuberculin reactions in non-atopics, and in the skin of healthy control subjects. Patients with AD (n ¼ 9) showed sensitization to common air-borne allergens (positive Phadiatop) and had total serum IgE values in the range from 10 to 4800 kU/l (median 170 kU/l ). Competitive reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) was used to assess IL-13 gene expression in skin biopsy specimens. IL-13 gene expression was markedly higher in chronic lichenified lesions of patients with AD (P < 0 . 01), and in the positive tuberculin reactions (P < 0 . 01; n ¼ 12) than in skin from healthy control subjects (n ¼ 10). However, there was no significant difference in IL-13 gene expression in the skin of patients with psoriasis (n ¼ 10) and that of healthy control subjects. The dermal cell infiltrates were larger and the relative amount of CD3 þ and CD4 þ cells in these infiltrates was higher in the skin of subjects with a positive tuberculin reaction than in lichenified AD skin. However, these differences were not reflected in differences in IL-13 gene expression. Different triggers of IL-13 gene expression may influence the diverse patterns of inflammation seen in different inflammatory skin disorders.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.