Mutation of staphylococcal accessory regulator (sarA) results in increased production of extracellular proteases in Staphylococcus aureus, which has been correlated with decreased biofilm formation and decreased accumulation of extracellular toxins. We used murine models of implant-associated biofilm infection and S. aureus bacteremia (SAB) to compare virulence of USA300 strain LAC, its isogenic sarA mutant, and derivatives of each of these strains with mutations in all 10 of the genes encoding recognized extracellular proteases. The sarA mutant was attenuated in both models, and this was reversed by eliminating production of extracellular proteases. To examine the mechanistic basis, we identified proteins impacted by sarA in a protease-dependent manner. We identified 253 proteins where accumulation was reduced in the sarA mutant compared to the parent strain, and was restored in the sarA/protease mutant. Additionally, in SAB, the LAC protease mutant exhibited a hypervirulent phenotype by comparison to the isogenic parent strain, demonstrating that sarA also positively regulates production of virulence factors, some of which are subject to protease-mediated degradation. We propose a model in which attenuation of sarA mutants is defined by their inability to produce critical factors and simultaneously repress production of extracellular proteases that would otherwise limit accumulation of virulence factors.

Hormones that interact with seven‐ transmembrane spanning receptors, generally con‐sidered to be involved in acute signaling functions, also induce longer term effects on gene expression and cell growth. These genetic and proliferative effects can be induced by activation of receptors that signal through heterotrimeric GTP‐binding proteins (G‐proteins) of the Gq family, pertussis toxin‐sensitive Gi/Go proteins, Gs, or G12/G13. Numerous growth‐promoting G protein‐coupled receptors activate the low molecular weight G‐protein Ras and stimulate mitogen‐activated protein kinase. Recent data suggest that c‐Jun NH2‐terminal kinase is also activated, possibly through interaction with low molecular weight G‐proteins of the Rho family. Because G protein‐coupled receptors lack intrinsic tyrosine kinase activity, the mechanisms by which heterotrimeric G‐proteins couple to these kinase cascades remain to be elucidated. By analogy to growth factor receptors, G protein‐coupled receptors may access these kinase cascades through binding of adapter proteins or recruitment of cytosolic tyrosine kinases. It is likely that interactions between multiple signaling pathways are required for G protein‐coupled receptors to propagate signals to the nucleus.—Post, G. R., Brown, J. H. G protein‐coupled receptors and signaling pathways regulating growth responses. FASEBJ. 10, 741‐749 (1996)

In response to hormones and mechanical stretch, neonatal rat ventricular myocytes exhibit a hypertrophic response that is characterized by induction of cardiac-specific genes and increased myocardial cell size. Hypertrophic stimuli also activate mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK), an enzyme thought to play a central role in the regulation of cell growth and differentiation. To determine if MAPK activation is sufficient for acquisition of the molecular and morphological features of cardiac hypertrophy we compared four agonists that stimulate G protein-coupled receptors. Whereas phenylephrine and endothelin transactivate cardiac-specific promoter/luciferase reporter genes, increase atrial natriuretic factor (ANF) expression, and promote myofilament organization, neither carbachol nor ATP induces these responses. Interestingly, all four agonists activate both the p42 and the p44 isoforms of MAPK. Furthermore, the kinetics of MAPK activation are not different for the hypertrophic agonist phenylephrine and the nonhypertrophic agonist carbachol. Transient transfection of myocytes with dominant-interfering mutants of p42 and p44 MAPK failed to block phenylephrine-induced ANF expression, although Ras-induced gene expression was inhibited by expression of the mutant MAPK constructs. Moreover, PD 098059, an inhibitor of MAPK kinase, blocked phenylephrine-stimulated MAPK activity but not ANF reporter gene expression. Thus, MAPK activation is not sufficient for G protein receptor-mediated induction of cardiac cell growth and gene expression and is apparently not required for transcriptional activation of the ANF gene.

The regulation of the cellular distribution and intracellular signaling properties of the alpha(1B)- and alpha(1D)- adrenoceptor (alpha(1)-AR) subtypes was examined in stably transfected Rat 1 fibroblasts. In unstimulated cells, alpha(1B)-AR expression was noted primarily on the cell surface. Treatment with phenylephrine induced internalization of the alpha(1B)-AR and promoted association with arrestin 2. The internalized alpha(1B)-AR colocalized with the transferrin receptor, an endosomal marker. In unstimulated fibroblasts, the alpha(1D)-AR was detected in a perinuclear orientation and was colocalized with arrestin 2 in a compartment also containing the transferrin receptor. After treatment with prazosin, which exhibits inverse agonist properties, the alpha(1D)-AR was redistributed from intracellular sites to the cellular periphery and was no longer associated with the transferrin receptor or arrestin 2. alpha(1D)-AR-expressing cells exhibited a high degree of basal activity for both inositol phosphate formation and extracellular signal regulated kinase (ERK), which was reduced by treatment with prazosin. In these cells, phenylephrine induced a dose-dependent increase in inositol phosphate formation but had no effect on ERK activity. In alpha(1B) -AR-expressing cells, phenylephrine stimulated both inositol phosphate formation and ERK activity. These data show that: 1) there are differences in the cellular localization of the alpha(1)-AR subtypes; 2) the alpha(1B)-AR exhibits expected G protein-coupled receptor activity regarding cellular localization, agonist-mediated internalization, and coupling to second messengers; and 3) the alpha(1D)-AR is constitutively active and, as a result, is localized to intracellular compartments involved in receptor recycling.